ated on the
> computer?
"best to create the folders and do the sorting on the server. then they
are where they belong wherever you reference them from."
Ok. I see that you are using the beta version of TB, 5.0.0.
When I tried to set up IMAP when I went from ver. 1.60 to 4.0.18, it
did
hotoblogs/5882
Using IMAP with The Bat! 5.0.0.129 BETA on Windows Vista version 6,0 (Service
Pack 2)
Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hi
On Sunday 16 January 2011 at 4:49:50 AM, in
,
Sacks, Avram wrote:
> Is it possible to have IMAP and still download a copy
> to your computer?
Yes.
--
Best regards
MFPAmailto:expires2...@ymail.com
Lack of money is no obstacle. Lack of an idea is an obstacle.
On Friday, January 14, 2011 at 2:28 PM Peter Fjelsten wrote regarding
the use of TB and smartphones with IMAP
"I check the same accounts using an Android phone, webmail, TheBat and
Outlook.
Using IMAP means that a mail is marked read when it's read on any of
those
clients. Also a
rved through use of IMAP?
Exactly.
I check the same accounts using an Android phone, webmail, TheBat and Outlook.
Using IMAP means that a mail is marked read when it's read on any of those
clients. Also all mail is available to all clients since it sits on the server.
> POP is used for
Hi, all.
I and my wife may soon be migrating to "smartphones." However, how
does one synchronize e-mail between two computers and two smartphones?
Is this purpose served through use of IMAP? If so, isn't that a
problem? I have tried to get IMAP to work with The Bat, but ha
(and you should notice some difference)
Is it possible my problem with the IMAP inbox could be
related to the cache ..?
Over time I am discovering things about this. The filters
will no longer run on that inbox, and the 'delete' button
doesn't work on it at all, the delete key on the k
On 10/26/2010 you wrote:
> I have Thunderbird installed for just such occasions. My preferred
> client is The Bat, but since it is IMAP, I can use any client to get the
> messages and Thunderbird is a good way of testing whether the problem
> is server or client related.
I
On Tuesday, October 26, 2010, 5:03:47 AM, jb_lists...@trink.co.uk wrote:
>> I'm beginning to think that not many Batters are using
>> IMAP, and maybe more to the point, the reason for it :-/
> I have Thunderbird installed for just such occasions. My preferred
> client i
Hello TheLimit,
On Monday, October 25, 2010, 9:57:08 PM, TheLimit wrote:
> Thanks for your reply. If any of my answers give you
> reason to think I can give the thing a swift kick, I'd
> appreciate knowing what boots to wear :-)
> I'm beginning to think that not many Ba
aiting for three days. And the mail server is
in the basement; speed shouldn't be an issue :-/ I'm going
to have to go and see if I can read at least some of these
message straight off the server, because they really won't
wait :-/
Maybe I should just go to POP on this account too
Hello TheLimit,
On Sunday, October 24, 2010, 7:12:04 PM, TheLimit wrote:
> Nothing has changed in the account settings. I'm stumped.
> If anyone can tell me how to get it to load these messages
> so I can read them, I'm all ears. A few of them at least are
> important; those which are obviously s
Hi Batters -
My IMAP account has stopped loading messages.
I'm not sure how to describe this; it lists the messages,
and has continued (for the two days this has happened) to
dl the subject lines, but refuses to load the messages.
The text window just says 'no message loaded'
On Sunday, August 22, 2010, 7:37:26 PM, TheLimit wrote:
> And you use both?
actually no. I rarely use pop at all any more. Have my IMAP account
collect all my POP mail.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at h
On 8/22/2010 you wrote:
>
> can't imagine how anything is different in IMAP as far as templates
> go. Never noticed it here.
And you use both?
These POP accounts seem fine. As I get a completely
bizarre time lag sometimes doing things in IMAP, I left
this particular probl
On Sunday, August 22, 2010, 8:30:23 AM, MFPA wrote:
> For IMAP accounts behaving differently, dunno as I only use POP.
can't imagine how anything is different in IMAP as far as templates
go. Never noticed it here.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dc
ngs and in the templates themselves?
Is it something simple, like the tick being removed from "use a
specific template for replies [or new messages]" in the AB entry?
Or having more than one AB entry for the same contact but only setting
up the template in one of them? Or the SHIFT ke
rest refuse to play, period. I get a totally
blank mail, and the F4 key doesn't work on replies. I
can't figure it out. They used to work fine.
This is an IMAP account. The POP account seems OK, though
I haven't got very far with it. Will that go away too .. ?
What's going
make sense. Sometimes old habits should die
easier :-)
[snip]
> You could look at the message headers. Redirected messages will have
> an extra few lines at the top relating to the journey from your POP
> account via SMTP to your IMAP account.
Ah. I'll do that.
Thanks a million!
>
or me.
> Amazingly - bearing in mind that I was wrestling with
> the thing over a couple of days - at some point
> yesterday all the messages in the POP inbox did get
> shifted over to the correct folder in the IMAP box.
> Several times, apparently; there are now multiple dupes
> i
On 7/26/2010 you wrote:
> There is hope. I just tested the latest Alpha and IMAP is starting to look
> like
> its working much better.
rotfl!
I mean, it's great to know that and all, but I had hoped
there was something I could do now!
So should I take that to mean that
Hello TheLimit,
A reminder of what TheLimit typed on:
Monday, July 26, 2010 at 16:00:45 GMT -0700
T> One of the things that is driving me mad with this IMAP
T> account is that there is always a lag for anything I do,
T> except initiating or replying to a message. Deletes
T> someti
(reply to message of Friday, June 18, 2010)
Hi Raymund,
>> I feel that The Bat still does not handle IMAP very well.
> Welcome to the club. Luckily version 5 is on its way.
Very good to hear! I'm looking forward to it!
>> I'm regularly experiencing this problem:
>
Hi Laura!
> I feel that The Bat still does not handle IMAP very well.
Welcome to the club. Luckily version 5 is on its way.
> I'm regularly experiencing this problem:
> I write an email and click on 'send' (or I use Ctrl-Enter).
> The mail goes to my Outbox.
I guess
Hi there,
I feel that The Bat still does not handle IMAP very well.
I'm regularly experiencing this problem:
I write an email and click on 'send' (or I use Ctrl-Enter).
The mail goes to my Outbox.
After a while it still is in my Outbox, and not in my 'Sent mail', so
I s
TheBat-users,
Since I can see in Mantis that work has commenced on IMAP, I write to see if
others have this problem. I am not running the newest version as I refuse to
upgrade before IMAP improves. Remote Outbox.
I create a new mail and write some text. This is an HTML mail but I am pretty
sure
On Tuesday, June 23, 2009, 8:23:01 PM, Lynn wrote:
> I've discovered another problem here, which is that none of the changes
> made to the folders on the server seem to be updating in TB! - which
> means I will likely have to delete the accounts and start again :-/
manage imap
6/23/2009
s> When you right click on the account in the tree view (the root node,
s> above the Inbox), there's an option synchronize all folders. That
s> might be what you're looking for. I don't dare to click on it right
s> now to test this, though.
Thanks, simbabque. Since I have nothing muc
Hello Lynn,
Monday, June 22, 2009, 9:42:19 PM, Lynn wrote:
> I *must* be missing something here, surely??? Is there no way just to
> check the little boxes for all the folders in one fell swoop and tell
> them to be full sync??
When you right click on the account in the tree view (the root node,
Hi Batters -
Well, it never ends, does it? Something else I can't figure out here.
Some of these accounts I've inherited (a volunteer thing, for those who
missed my first pleas for help) have well over a hundred folders in
them, and because the organization just migrated all their mailboxes to
a
On Friday, May 22, 2009, 10:24:21 AM, Stuart Cuddy wrote:
> Always glad to help out a fellow IMAP fan. Just hoping that we will
> see something soon regarding improvements. HINT, HINT, HINT
Am hoping that soon to follow release of 4.1.14.xx will be the IMAP
beta series.
--
Dw
Hello Lynn,
A reminder of what Lynn typed on:
Thursday, May 21, 2009 at 20:10:34 GMT -0700
L> That did it. I knew I must be missing something obvious!
No problem. Always glad to help out a fellow IMAP fan. Just hoping that we will
see something soon regarding improvements. HINT, HINT, H
5/21/2009
L>> Can anyone think what happened to these two directories and how I can
L>> retrieve them? I'm sure this is mindlessly simple, but I can't figure it
L>> out.
SC> Right click on the account name and select Manage IMAP Folders. Once
there
SC&
Hello Lynn,
Thursday, May 21, 2009, 5:45:24 PM, you wrote:
L> Can anyone think what happened to these two directories and how I can
L> retrieve them? I'm sure this is mindlessly simple, but I can't figure it
L> out.
Right click on the account name and select Manage IMAP
Hi all -
I recently acquired some mail accounts which need to be IMAP, which I
don't ordinarily use, so really have no clue about. They came in to TB
very easily, but I'm having a directory problem I can't figure out.
One of them has a lot of directories and subdirectories, b
5/16/2009
JF> Yes, i have 8xPOP and 1xIMAP running, just create a new Account with
JF> IMAP.
Yes, it went beautifully! Very easy!
Thanks!
--
Lynn
:Hawthorne: :usflag: :canadaflag:
theli...@comcast.net * * *Aun Aprendo
I'd rather be WARP'ed* * * Team OS
Samstag, 16. Mai 2009 at 00:15, Lynn wrote:
> I need to access some IMAP accounts, but all my current accounts are
> POP.
>
> Is it possible to do both?
Yes, i have 8xPOP and 1xIMAP running, just create a new Account with
IMAP.
--
With kind Regards
Jens Franik
mailto:je...@gmx.d
5/16/2009
DAC> yes. start, i think, it's been ages since i did this, by creating a
DAC> new account, and pick imap, then it's just a matter of knowing
DAC> addresses for your servers, etc.
It was just that simple, and didn't even make me chase server info! I
lov
5/16/2009
SC> Are you talking about accessing the same accounts as IMAP and POP or some
IMAP
SC> and some POP. The latter is possible for sure.
[snip]
Yes, I am and I did and it was simple and is working beautifully.
This is why I won't give up TB :-)
Thanks -
--
Lynn
On Friday, May 15, 2009, 5:15:09 PM, Lynn wrote:
> Is it possible to do both?
yes. start, i think, it's been ages since i did this, by creating a
new account, and pick imap, then it's just a matter of knowing
addresses for your servers, etc.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 p
Hello Lynn,
Friday, May 15, 2009, 5:15:09 PM, you wrote:
L> I need to access some IMAP accounts, but all my current accounts are
L> POP.
L> Is it possible to do both?
Are you talking about accessing the same accounts as IMAP and POP or some IMAP
and some POP. The latter is possible
Hi Batters -
I need to access some IMAP accounts, but all my current accounts are
POP.
Is it possible to do both?
tia -
--
Lynn
:Hawthorne: :usflag: :canadaflag:
theli...@comcast.net * * *Aun Aprendo
I'd rather be WARP'ed* * * Team OS/2
TBv.4.1.
Dwight,
On 21-03-2009 19:52, you wrote in :
> I don't understand why you don't sort the mail in your IMAP account
> as it arrives there. I do virtually no filtering with TB! anymore.
Possible reasons:
* If you are unable to do server side filtering
* If you sometimes read m
Hello Dwight,
Saturday, March 21, 2009, 7:52:39 PM, Dwight Corrin wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 17, 2009, 1:15:06 PM, Peter Fjelsten wrote:
>>> Has anyone encountered a similar problem or any idea why this happens?
> I don't understand why you don't sort the mail in y
On Tuesday, March 17, 2009, 1:15:06 PM, Peter Fjelsten wrote:
>> Has anyone encountered a similar problem or any idea why this happens?
I don't understand why you don't sort the mail in your IMAP account
as it arrives there. I do virtually no filtering with TB! anymore
simbabque,
On 17-03-2009 16:11, you wrote in :
> Has anyone encountered a similar problem or any idea why this happens?
Yes and no.
I think it's the weak IMAP implementation (I have a 20/2 MBit line).
--
Best regards
Peter Fjelsten
4.0.39.33 (BETA) Pro MyGate, AVG
12 IMAP
Hello Tbudl,
I've got an IMAP account with lots of mail. I connect through the
internet with a 1024/128 kbit/s line. The account is checked in
intervals of 10 minutes and it disconnects after 2 minutes. Only mails
below a certain size get downloaded completely. For the others, it
only get
I am currently using TB 4.0.24. I also have a gmail account which I have
set to IMAP. I have a large archive of messages in TB that I would like to
get on the gmail server. I hope that there is a more efficient way to do it
than I am doing. Let me start off by saying that I know virtually
Hello Tbudl,
I'm currently testing IMAP, and noticed that when I delete an
attachment from a message and then move the message to another folder
the attachment is back there. Purging the folder before moving the
message did not help.
Is it possible with IMAP to delete only the attachment f
on but not active?
Well, I assume there would be more connections to the server and hence
more load but I am no mail server expert.
--
Best regards
Peter Fjelsten
4.0.34 Pro MyGate, AVG
12 IMAP (Courier) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 1 POP3 MyGate, 300K+ msgs.
Windows
Hi
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 at 6:49:40 PM, in
, Bob Riley wrote:
> I was thinking of conserving bandwidth in the whole system.
Further to my previous message, I would imagine being logged on but
not actually doing anything uses very little bandwidth (-;
--
Best regards,
MFPA
Hi
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 at 6:37:17 PM, in
, Peter Fjelsten wrote:
> It means that it disconnects from the server if you do not "work" with
> it. On xDSL there should be no reason for this.
Does it have any adverse effect on the server performance if there are
lots of people logged on
Hi
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 at 6:49:40 PM, in
, Bob Riley wrote:
> I was thinking of conserving bandwidth in the whole system. I think
> of IMAP as very handy (convenient) but perhaps using much more
> bandwidth than POP. Am I mistaken?
Logic would suggest that IMAP (and web
ason for this.
I was thinking of conserving bandwidth in the whole system. I think
of IMAP as very handy (convenient) but perhaps using much more
bandwidth than POP. Am I mistaken?
>> And - does that mean that TB becomes active when I do something like
>> select or open a message?
&g
der Automatically connect to
server it will.
--
Best regards
Peter Fjelsten
4.0.34 Pro MyGate, AVG
12 IMAP (Courier) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 1 POP3 MyGate, 300K+ msgs.
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Current versio
Hi Everyone,
I have been using TB 4 for IMAP with my Gmail account. So far (since
mid-July), I think TB has done well with Gmail's IMAP. I have a
question about an IMAP account setting, however.
One of the last Mail Management pane items to be possibly checked is
this, "Whe
Hi Stefan,
Monday, August 11, 2008, 4:11:40 AM, you wrote:
> Hello Peter,
>>> We are going to rework IMAP part as we now have more
>>> experience with using IMAP in "real world", so working with it must
>>> become smoother and more predictable.
PF>
Stefan,
On 11-08-2008 12:11, you wrote in
:
>>> We are going to rework IMAP part as we now have more
>>> experience with using IMAP in "real world", so working with it must
>>> become smoother and more predictable.
PF>> When?
> Right after the
Hello Peter,
>> We are going to rework IMAP part as we now have more
>> experience with using IMAP in "real world", so working with it must
>> become smoother and more predictable.
PF> When?
Right after the upcoming release, the new index format will be
introduc
Stefan,
On 02-08-2008 08:18, you wrote in
:
> We are going to rework IMAP part as we now have more
> experience with using IMAP in "real world", so working with it must
> become smoother and more predictable.
When?
--
Best regards
Peter Fjelsten
4.0.20.4 Pro MyGat
Hi Stefan,
Hi Stefan,
Saturday, August 2, 2008, 12:18:38 AM, you wrote:
> Hello Bob,
BR>> Under "Manage IMAP Folders," I have most folders (except for trash,
BR>> junk email and All mail) synchronizing set at "full messages." I
BR>> don't hav
Hello Robin,
RA> Hmm, I don't think that I really understand what synchronising and
RA> subscribing mean in relation to IMAP. Can you explain it, or point to a web
RA> resource that does So
IMAP subscription defines the set of folders (mailboxes in IMAP terms)
you want to read ofte
Hello Bob,
BR> Under "Manage IMAP Folders," I have most folders (except for trash,
BR> junk email and All mail) synchronizing set at "full messages." I
BR> don't have junk email and All mail synchronizing at all. Trash is set
BR> at "headers only.&q
Hi Stefan,
Thursday, July 31, 2008, 4:48:04 AM, you wrote:
> Hello Bob,
BR>> In short, so far I think Evolution is easier to set up for IMAP, and
BR>> the best settings seem to be built in as default. In TB, the settings
BR>> require more fine-tuning, and I am asking th
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 at 13:48:04 +0300, Stefan wrote:
> Hello Bob,
>
> If you don't do any fine-tune, you should get TB! working good and
> fast with GMail's IMAP. At least, it works this way here.
> Synchronisation settings should be used only if you want to stay
> of
Hello Bob,
BR> In short, so far I think Evolution is easier to set up for IMAP, and
BR> the best settings seem to be built in as default. In TB, the settings
BR> require more fine-tuning, and I am asking this list if there is a setting
BR> in TB that will allow me to read new incom
synchonize THAT MESSAGE the moment I
>> select it? I believe that is how Evolution is set by default.
>
> It is already supposed to work this way.
>
> There is an option in "IMAP fine tune" named "When browsing, receive
> only msg text". Make sure this is disabled
Hi Bob,
> Is there a way to have TB synchonize THAT MESSAGE the moment I
> select it? I believe that is how Evolution is set by default.
It is already supposed to work this way.
There is an option in "IMAP fine tune" named "When browsing, receive
only msg text". Make
Hello Bob,
Sunday, July 20, 2008, 2:58:00 PM, you wrote:
BR> In TB, the settings
BR> require more fine-tuning, and I am asking this list if there is a setting
BR> in TB that will allow me to read new incoming messages when I first
BR> select them?
BR> FYI, right now, I have synchronizing set a
Hi Everyone,
I have just switched my Gmail setup from POP to IMAP, since I wish to
access my mail from both Windows and Ubuntu Linux and spend time in
both operating systems, depending upon my tasks. I have some
questions about setting up IMAP in TB. I have used TB for my POP
mailer for
Hi,
> Is there an email client anyone can recommend that plays nice with
> IMAP? Please don't say Outlook. Thunderbird? Eudora? Anything?
I've never had any IMAP problems with Thunderbird. On the other hand,
it only provides rather basic functions, so the changeover shock
Hi NickOhare,
Thursday, June 12, 2008, 5:30:08 PM, you wrote:
> Hi All,
> Firstly thank you Alto and Stuart for your advice.
> Is there an email client anyone can recommend that plays nice with
> IMAP? Please don't say Outlook. Thunderbird? Eudora? Anything?
Here is a lin
On Thursday, June 12, 2008, 6:30:08 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there an email client anyone can recommend that plays nice with
> IMAP?
I have no problems with TB.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugm
Hi All,
Firstly thank you Alto and Stuart for your advice.
Is there an email client anyone can recommend that plays nice with
IMAP? Please don't say Outlook. Thunderbird? Eudora? Anything?
Best regards,
Nick
Current version is 4.0
remember a few threads on this list years ago discussing its
NZc> IMAP limitations. And when I say a few years ago it may of been 4 or
NZc> 5 years ago. Has Ritlabs dealt with these issues? I would rather not
NZc> recommend switching over to another client.
The quality of TB!'s IMAP
Hi,
> [IMAP]
> Can I still use TB! as the client.
That depends on your level of tolerance. If you have a feasable
alternative, take it.
> but I do remember a few threads on this list years ago discussing
> its IMAP limitations. And when I say a few years ago it may of been
&g
Hi All,
Firstly I would like to thank all the people who responded to my
original query.
Looks as though in order to set up a networked multi-user TB!
configuration I going to have to use IMAP. I've already done the
research for the server side, but now I need information for the
client
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 at 14:39:46 -0500, Achdut18 wrote:> OK. I just tried to
reset the protocol for this acccount from POP3
> to IMAP4. However, the Bat produced an error message that said:
> "Cannot change protocol to IMAP4. Create a new account instead."
>
> Well, I don't want to create a new a
pick up newer
A> mail, and not the mail downloaded by the first computer. I checked
A> my gmail settings and discovered that I have IMAP enabled for each
A> of my g-mail accounts and nothing is checked in the POP download
A> section of the settings area. Since I only keep listserv ma
r. I
A> checked my gmail settings and discovered that I have IMAP enabled for each of
A> my g-mail accounts and nothing is checked in the POP download section of the
A> settings area. Since I only keep listserv mail in gmail, I never want that
A> mail deleted from the gmail servers.
ly pick up newer mail, and not the mail downloaded by the first computer. I
A> checked my gmail settings and discovered that I have IMAP enabled for each of
A> my g-mail accounts and nothing is checked in the POP download section of the
A> settings area. Since I only keep listserv mail in gm
settings
and discovered that I have IMAP enabled for each of my g-mail accounts and
nothing is checked in the POP download section of the settings area. Since I
only keep listserv mail in gmail, I never want that mail deleted from the gmail
servers. So, how should I configure those settings so
On Tuesday, February 19, 2008, 7:04:00 PM, Christopher W. wrote:
> What server? Mine is Cyrus.
same here. I'm at fastmail
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com
Using IMAP with The Bat! 4.0.14.3 on Windo
Dwight Corrin @ 2008-2-19 6:48:11 PM
"IMAP Server Disconnecting"
> too bad. mine got quite a bit better when I did that
What server? Mine is Cyrus.
--
Christopher
Using The Bat! v4.0.14 on Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6000.
Accessing POP3 and IMAP4 mailboxs.
Today's Oxymor
On Tuesday, February 19, 2008, 6:18:22 PM, Christopher W. wrote:
> Nope:
too bad. mine got quite a bit better when I did that
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com
Using IMAP with The Bat! 4.0.14.3 on Wind
Dwight A Corrin @ 2008-2-19 4:27:02 PM
"IMAP Server Disconnecting"
>> However, if I am idle for a bit (less than a minute), The Bat!
>> reports that the server has closed the connection.
> try changing your server timeout to 180 seconds. (it's down toward
> th
of account properties)
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com
Using IMAP with The Bat! 4.0.14.2 on Windows XP version 5,1 (Service Pack 2)
Current version is 4.0.14
Christopher,
On 19-02-2008 22:18, you wrote in
:
> I was wondering whether anyone else was experiencing this.
I have also seen this more in version 4.x
--
Best regards
Peter Fjelsten
4.0.14 Pro MyGate, AVG
12 IMAP (Courier) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 1 POP3 MyGate, 300
I was wondering whether anyone else was experiencing this.
I have my IMAP account setup as can be seen here:
http://www.chriswarrington.com/imap-0.png
http://www.chriswarrington.com/imap-1.png
http://www.chriswarrington.com/imap-2.png
However, if I am idle for a bit (less than a minute), The
Hello Robert,
Sunday, February 3, 2008, 10:11:27 AM, you wrote:
RT> Hello Jonathan,
RT> Sunday, February 3, 2008, 1:39:21 PM, you wrote:
>> I have 3.99.29 installed. I've noticed that on my IMAP accounts, the
>> filtering doesn't always work. When I exit and rest
Hello Dwight,
Sunday, February 3, 2008, 6:08:15 PM, you wrote:
> I continue to wonder what the point of filtering in TB! for IMAP. All
> my filtering is done server side. That way I don't have to wait until
The key point is that not everyone using IMAP has access to server
side filt
B! to do it.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
1201 W River Blvd Apt B108
Wichita KS 67203
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
Using IMAP with The Bat! 4.0.0.17 (ALPHA) on Windows XP version 5,1 (Service
Pack 2)
Current version is 3.99.27
Hello Dwight,
Sunday, February 3, 2008, 11:08:15 AM, you wrote:
DAC> I continue to wonder what the point of filtering in TB! for IMAP. All
DAC> my filtering is done server side. That way I don't have to wait until
DAC> TB! has been run to have my mail filtered. If I am filtering on
On Sunday, February 3, 2008, 9:11:27 AM, Robert Tomanek wrote:
> The Bat!'s IMAP filtering is broken. I doubt it will ever get fixed
> since IMAP doesn't seem to be getting much attention from the
> developers.
I continue to wonder what the point of filtering in TB! for IMAP.
Hello Jonathan,
Sunday, February 3, 2008, 1:39:21 PM, you wrote:
> I have 3.99.29 installed. I've noticed that on my IMAP accounts, the
> filtering doesn't always work. When I exit and restart the program,
> and then select the unfiltered messages and run the input filter
Hello Jonathan,
Sunday, February 3, 2008, 6:39:21 AM, you wrote:
> Still looking for an answer for this problem:
> I have 3.99.29 installed. I've noticed that on my IMAP accounts, the
> filtering doesn't always work. When I exit and restart the program,
> and then
Hello TBUDL,
Still looking for an answer for this problem:
I have 3.99.29 installed. I've noticed that on my IMAP accounts, the
filtering doesn't always work. When I exit and restart the program,
and then select the unfiltered messages and run the input filters on
the selected mess
Hello Stuart,
Monday, January 28, 2008, 10:45:26 PM, you wrote:
> Hello Monsell,
> A reminder of what [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed on:
> Monday, January 28, 2008 at 20:15:10 GMT +0530
mmic>> as said previously, i triggered one filter to check with IMAP but it
mmic>> is no
t;>> the advantage of IMAP compared to POP, and how to use it.
SC>> Here is a paper on it, although there must be better sites for the
SC>> topic.
Stuart> Ooops.
Stuart> http://www.cs.arizona.edu/computing/email/imap-pop.html
Thanks for the link. I read it, interes
Hello Stuart,
A reminder of what Stuart Cuddy typed on:
Monday, January 28, 2008 at 11:59:42 GMT -0600
PK>> Cab anyone direct me to a website or somewhere where I can learn what is
PK>> the advantage of IMAP compared to POP, and how to use it.
SC> Here is a paper on it, alth
201 - 300 of 1417 matches
Mail list logo
