Re: PGP-MIME signatures (was:Re[3]: message.att file attachmentwith The Bat! v2.0 issue)

2003-09-03 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Paul, Wednesday, September 3, 2003, 2:04:43 PM, you wrote: PH> I'm clueless as to how I enable PGP-MIME signatures. Googling PH> didn't help nor could I find in the TBUDL archives. Is it possible PH> with GnuGP? I do this in each of my "moderated" replies in the QT. %USEPGP%PGPMIME%SIGNCOM

PGP-MIME signatures (was:Re[3]: message.att file attachment withThe Bat! v2.0 issue)

2003-09-03 Thread Paul Harrison
I'm clueless as to how I enable PGP-MIME signatures. Googling didn't help nor could I find in the TBUDL archives. Is it possible with GnuGP? Paul pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.00 | "Using TBUDL" information: http:/

Re[2]: message.att file attachment with The Bat! v2.0 issue

2003-09-02 Thread Paul Harrison
Hello Thomas, Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 6:29:26 PM, you wrote: TF> Hello Mark, TF> On Tue, 2 Sep 2003 13:18:46 -0400 GMT (03/09/2003, 00:18 +0700 GMT), TF> Mark wrote: >> What are the message.att file attachment appear on all The Bat! v2.0 >> users e-mails? TF>

Re: message.att file attachment with The Bat! v2.0 issue

2003-09-02 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Mark, On Tue, 2 Sep 2003 13:18:46 -0400 GMT (03/09/2003, 00:18 +0700 GMT), Mark wrote: > What are the message.att file attachment appear on all The Bat! v2.0 > users e-mails? Often they are PGP/MIME signatures, which you can only fully appreciate if you use TB 2.0. -- Cheers,

message.att file attachment with The Bat! v2.0 issue

2003-09-02 Thread Mark
What are the message.att file attachment appear on all The Bat! v2.0 users e-mails? -- Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.00 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.

Re[2]: message.att?

2001-09-13 Thread Vincent - D. Ertner
Hi Co-Batties, thanx for the infos - it helped a lot! Cheers, Vince -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Lates

Re: message.att?

2001-09-13 Thread Marek Mikus
On Wed, 12 Sep 2001, Vincent - D. Ertner wrote: > I guess it has been asked already, but I didn't find a hint: > What does message.att contain, when I receive a message from > an OUtlook-User? use program called FENTUN, www.fentun.com > And even more important: What can I tell

Re: message.att?

2001-09-12 Thread Raj
Vincent, On Wed, 12 Sep 2001, at 21:51:46 [GMT +0200] (which was 1:21 AM where I live) you wrote: VDE> I guess it has been asked already, but I didn't find a hint: VDE> What does message.att contain, when I receive a message from VDE> an OUtlook-User? VDE> And even more impo

Re: message.att?

2001-09-12 Thread Nick Gordon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Batpersons, On or about, Wednesday, September 12, 2001, 8:51:46 PM, we have reason to believe that Vincent - D. Ertner wrote: VDE> Hi Co-Batties, VDE> I guess it has been asked already, but I didn't find a hint: VDE> What do

message.att?

2001-09-12 Thread Vincent - D. Ertner
Hi Co-Batties, I guess it has been asked already, but I didn't find a hint: What does message.att contain, when I receive a message from an OUtlook-User? And even more important: What can I tell the Outlook-User how to disable this "feature"?

Re: message.att?

2001-01-07 Thread Brian Clark
Hello Karin, (KS == "Karin Spaink") [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: MDP>>> The problem (as ever) is Micro$oft. This is a proprietary MDP>>> attachment format for Outlook and Exchange users. There is a MDP>>> freeware decoder >> FYI, I've been getting these types of attachments from Eudora users as

Re: message.att?

2001-01-07 Thread Karin Spaink
On 08-01-2001 at 02:34, Brian Clark kindly wrote: MDP>> The problem (as ever) is Micro$oft. This is a proprietary MDP>> attachment format for Outlook and Exchange users. There is a MDP>> freeware decoder > FYI, I've been getting these types of attachments from Eudora users as > well. It's a Roya

Re: message.att?

2001-01-07 Thread Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris)
ow of any other way MDP> of getting at the real data. Oh yes, you're right here Marck but only at a half. There are some mail server installations that are sending message.att file attached to a Mail Delivery Subsystem reports (AKA delivery-status reports). In this case the actual file co

Re: message.att?

2001-01-07 Thread Brian Clark
Hello Marck, (MDP == "Marck D. Pearlstone") [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: JS>> I received an e-mail with an attachment from a friend. The JS>> attachment (a word document) was saved in The Bat as JS>> "message.att" and unreadable. JS>> Is the atta

Re: message.att?

2001-01-07 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Andrey, On 08 January 2001 at 03:19:35 +0300 (which was 00:19 where I live) Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) wrote and made these points: JR>> Would an alternative be to save the attachment & open it in JR>> Word or some other M$ text editor?

Re: message.att?

2001-01-07 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Johan, On 08 January 2001 at 01:26:13 +0100 (which was 00:26 where I live) Johan Svahn wrote and made these points: JS> I dl:ed it and tried to set it up.. but there are only JS> instructions for how to set it up in Netscape and I cant find a JS>

Re: message.att?

2001-01-07 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello Johan, On Mon, 8 Jan 2001 at 01:26:13 GMT +0100 (which was 4:26 PM where I live) witnesses say Johan Svahn typed: > I dl:ed it and tried to set it up.. but there are only instructions > for how to set it up in Netscape and I cant find a way to define MIME > file extensions in The Bat

Re: message.att?

2001-01-07 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jan, On 07 January 2001 at 16:13:50 -0500 (which was 21:13 where I live) Jan Rifkinson wrote and made these points: Marck>> [...] This is a proprietary attachment Marck>> format for Outlook and Exchange users. There is a freeware decoder Marck>

Re[2]: message.att?

2001-01-07 Thread Johan Svahn
Hello Manfred, Sunday, January 07, 2001, 4:56:12 PM, you wrote: ME> On 07-01-2001 at 15:07:27GMT + (which was 15:07 where I live) ME> Marck D. Pearlstone wrote regarding the subject of "message.att?" ME> Hello Marck, Marck>> The problem (as ever) is Micro$o

Re: message.att?

2001-01-07 Thread Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris)
Hello! Monday, January 08, 2001, 12:13:50 AM, Jan Rifkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Marck>> [...] This is a proprietary attachment Marck>> format for Outlook and Exchange users. There is a freeware decoder Marck>> called Fentun [...] JR> Would an alternative be to save the attachment &

Re[2]: message.att?

2001-01-07 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hi Marck, On Sunday, January 07, 2001 15:07:27 + you wrote the following in regards to "message.att?": Marck> [...] This is a proprietary attachment Marck> format for Outlook and Exchange users. There is a freeware decoder Marck> called Fentun [...] Would an alt

Re: message.att?

2001-01-07 Thread Manfred Ell
On 07-01-2001 at 15:07:27GMT + (which was 15:07 where I live) Marck D. Pearlstone wrote regarding the subject of "message.att?" Hello Marck, Marck> The problem (as ever) is Micro$oft. This is a proprietary attachment Marck> format for Outlook and Exchange users. The

Re: message.att?

2001-01-07 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
as JS> "message.att" and unreadable. JS> Is the attachment wrongly decoded but the Bat or is the sender JS> which is the problem? The problem (as ever) is Micro$oft. This is a proprietary attachment format for Outlook and Exchange users. There is a freeware decoder called Fentun

message.att?

2001-01-07 Thread Johan Svahn
I received an e-mail with an attachment from a friend. The attachment (a word document) was saved in The Bat as "message.att" and unreadable. Is the attachment wrongly decoded but the Bat or is the sender which is the problem? Regar