On 2010-10-08 at 08:07 -0700, Andrew Hume wrote:
now i would have just said
hour = t/(3600 * 1000); // remember t is in milliseconds
// if i wanted hr in 00..23 range: hour = hour%24;
bill said
xx = t/1000
strncpy(hr_str, (ctime(xx)[11]), 2);
On 2010-09-25 at 02:03 -0500, Brad Knowles wrote:
Yup. The mmap() system call on NFS is undefined, which means that Berkeley
DB, and any other software that uses mmap() cannot safely be used on NFS.
This is supposedly fixed in the latest versions of NFS, but I have yet to
have that claim
On 2010-06-29 at 17:14 -0400, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
Using default settings, 7-zip lzma are much slower than bzip2. However,
if you specify --fast, then lzma is both 2x faster and 2x stronger than any
level of bzip2, which IMHO obsoletes bzip2.
I noticed my LZO results were screwed up.
On 2010-06-28 at 12:26 -0700, Brent Chapman wrote:
Everybody says but what if the switch somehow leaks packets from one VLAN
to another? Well, what if the switch ACLs didn't work, and passed traffic
that it shouldn't? Those would both be major security bugs, drawing a quick
response from the
On 2010-04-23 at 08:15 -0400, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
I was concluding precisely the opposite. Namely: To have the .snapshot
directory in every directory is nice and convenient for user access, but if
a user can mv some directory and suddenly it's not being backed up
anymore, not included
On 2010-02-18 at 22:10 -0600, Brad Knowles wrote:
On Feb 18, 2010, at 8:43 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
The ultimate goal is to have the job completed quickly. But that can only
be done if the number of blocks sent is minimized. Presently, rsync reads
the whole local file, and also
On 2010-02-17 at 22:44 +, Colm Buckley wrote:
So, I've been learning all about IPv6; lots of good stuff. Got myself a
SixXS tunnel, set up a routable subnet, set up radvd, configured DNS...
everything works great.
Slight strangeness with the OS X laptops, though - they seem to neither
On 2009-10-26 at 19:41 -0700, Robert Hajime Lanning wrote:
DNS can very easily not work. You just need every site managing their
own, while not listening to the One Who Knows DNS TM.
You should see the horrible mess some zone files are.
Wait, you mean those people actually updated DNS? Oh
On 2009-10-23 at 20:12 -0600, Jan L. Peterson wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 22:00 -0400, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
you could do most of this today with plus addressing like
david+catch...@lang.hm
How? I don't know of any option in exchange or gmail to enable such a
feature.
On 2009-10-11 at 23:41 -0400, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
In openvpn, each individual client gets a private key or a private
certificate. If that key or cert were acquired by anyone other than the
intended end user, it would be possible for someone unauthorized to get in.
Basically, this is a
On 2009-09-04 at 12:27 -0700, da...@lang.hm wrote:
for historical reasons (since it used to be the limit on swap partition
size), I have fallen in the habit of creating a 2G swap partition on all
my systems. If I was going to change it I would probably shrink it down
(by the time a system
On 2009-07-02 at 11:31 -0400, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
Until today, I only had one idea which came close - google gfs (not
global gfs) does exactly what I want except that it always writes to 3
or more peers. If google gfs is available for use (can install and be
used on linux) and if it's
On 2009-01-10 at 22:48 -0500, John BORIS wrote:
Thanks. No we didn't fill any disks. I have about 18 messages hung on
each of the 20 servers. I am about to just delete all of them and
restart things. I did a restart of the mmdf sctipts but that didn't
help. In the past the main relay server
On 2009-01-07 at 11:05 -0800, Phil Pennock wrote:
The new hole above looks as though it's useful for a direct
man-in-the-middle, but for as long as you accept certificates where a
path in the trust chain uses MD5 signatures you're also up a dark creek
without a paddle. Expecting users
Back in 2006, Hal Pomeranz asked for SOHO wifi AP recommendations. I'd
like to re-open the topic, asking for recommendations for 2008/2009,
off-list and I'll summarise.
Requirements:
* no client OS dependencies for configuration (see below)
* WPA2 PSK personal, more better
* IPv6 router, 6to4
15 matches
Mail list logo
