On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> > > - posix_openpt(), grantpt(), unlockpt() and ptsname(), and
> > > - utmpx.
> > >
> > > This causes a real burden on people trying to write network login
> > > services, terminal emulators, terminal multiplexers, etc.
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:28:47PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> > > - posix_openpt(), grantpt(), unlockpt() and ptsname(), and
> > > - utmpx.
> > >
> > > This causes a real burden on people trying to write network login
> > > services, terminal emulators, termina
Hi tech@
While building a kernel with option DEBUG to try to hunt down my issue
with the Libretto 70CT (PR 6052) I came across the following typos which
prevented the build:
sys/arch/i386/i386/trap.c
--- trap.c Wed Jul 14 00:55:31 2010
+++ mytrap.cWed Jul 14 00:44:26 2010
@@ -173,7
Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > - posix_openpt(), grantpt(), unlockpt() and ptsname(), and
> > - utmpx.
> >
> > This causes a real burden on people trying to write network login
> > services, terminal emulators, terminal multiplexers, etc.
>
> You are killing us with hyperbole.
Well, I have been wait
> * Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > First off, to get that off the plate, we don't have the POSIX, no call
> > it what it is --- SVR4 -- pty stuff because it is a gigantic race. It
> > was designed in response to the pty race research by Dan Bernstein,
> > but the result was that the SVR4 guys still got
Hi Theo,
* Theo de Raadt wrote:
> First off, to get that off the plate, we don't have the POSIX, no call
> it what it is --- SVR4 -- pty stuff because it is a gigantic race. It
> was designed in response to the pty race research by Dan Bernstein,
> but the result was that the SVR4 guys still got
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Ed Schouten wrote:
> I sent an email to tedu@ the other day, but I thought it may be better
> to just send it to tech@ to see whether we can sort this out.
Don't worry, I have not ignored your mail, only postponed processing it.
> - Is there any interest in getti
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 01:40:26AM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 01:58:50PM +, Michael Shalayeff wrote:
> > re
> > i was testing the diff on our shitz here and it works.
> > dual-port Intel PRO/1000 on pci-express and on-boards.
> > added a couple more checks where it se
> I sent an email to tedu@ the other day, but I thought it may be better
> to just send it to tech@ to see whether we can sort this out.
>
> After I implemented utmpx for FreeBSD, I realized OpenBSD is the only
> commonly used maintained UNIX-like operating system which doesn't
> implement:
>
> -
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:20:58AM -0600, Tobias Weingartner wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 13, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 09:32:30PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > > To help investigate some changes recently, I wrote a tool that will
> > > extract (reverse) patches from cvs. I wa
On Tuesday, July 13, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 09:32:30PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > To help investigate some changes recently, I wrote a tool that will
> > extract (reverse) patches from cvs. I was telling a coworker about this
> > today, and he said it was a lot like cv
> This causes a real burden on people trying to write network login
> services, terminal emulators, terminal multiplexers, etc.
it is really hard to take you serious when you say that every year,
to us.
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 01:58:50PM +, Michael Shalayeff wrote:
> re
> i was testing the diff on our shitz here and it works.
> dual-port Intel PRO/1000 on pci-express and on-boards.
> added a couple more checks where it seemed to make sense.
> those ports having problems before seem to work now
Hi
I'm interested, although I don't know what other opinions are of utmpx.
>From a quick look:
- Why delete ttyslot? Or, at least, why at the same time? Seems like
better done separately later to me.
- Not sure about removing the signal handler in last.
- How much third party software is thi
NajveDi Top Shop popusti do sada
Niske cene... I još niE>e!
Najbolje cene ovog leta, samo za vas! Uz popuste koji veD vaE>e, svaka 4
dana još jedan proizvod iz programa fitnes, lepota, zdrav E>ivot ili
domaDinstvo na raspolaganju je uz...
DODATNI POPUST
od -10%!
Ekskluzivna sniE>enja traju
re
i was testing the diff on our shitz here and it works.
dual-port Intel PRO/1000 on pci-express and on-boards.
added a couple more checks where it seemed to make sense.
those ports having problems before seem to work now.
cu
--
paranoic mickey (my employers have changed but, the name h
Hi folks,
I sent an email to tedu@ the other day, but I thought it may be better
to just send it to tech@ to see whether we can sort this out.
After I implemented utmpx for FreeBSD, I realized OpenBSD is the only
commonly used maintained UNIX-like operating system which doesn't
implement:
- posi
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 08:32:18AM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 01:36:34PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:45:08 +0200
> > > From: Claudio Jeker
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 09:48:03AM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> > > > Anyone
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 01:36:34PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:45:08 +0200
> > From: Claudio Jeker
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 09:48:03AM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> > > Anyone still using ioprbs(4)? If so, please test the diff below and
> > > report back to
> Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:45:08 +0200
> From: Claudio Jeker
>
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 09:48:03AM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> > Anyone still using ioprbs(4)? If so, please test the diff below and
> > report back to me.
> >
>
> No bad effects seen after light testing on a ADAPTEC 3200S t
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 09:48:03AM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> Anyone still using ioprbs(4)? If so, please test the diff below and
> report back to me.
>
No bad effects seen after light testing on a ADAPTEC 3200S that I found in
a dark corner of the basement. Dmesg below.
--
:wq Claudio
O
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 09:32:30PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> To help investigate some changes recently, I wrote a tool that will
> extract (reverse) patches from cvs. I was telling a coworker about this
> today, and he said it was a lot like cvsps. Maybe it is, but cvsps chokes
> big time tr
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 09:32:30PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> To help investigate some changes recently, I wrote a tool that will
> extract (reverse) patches from cvs. I was telling a coworker about this
> today, and he said it was a lot like cvsps. Maybe it is, but cvsps chokes
> big time tr
23 matches
Mail list logo
