On 2011/04/10 00:02, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
Hi,
while going through my wtmp with last(1) I noticed there could be a better
way than always gunzip'ing wtmp files and then using last -f. I've made
a patch for your consideration that does the following:
a) it checks if the file is a
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 01:45:36PM -0500, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
Hi,
I am replying in a single email.
I do a fsck once in a while, not regular. In the last 6-8 months I
might have done it about 5 times. And I did it multi-user the few
times I did it, but plan on doing it single user in
Now, consider this: the fs code is very heavily tested. People use it 24 hours
a day, 365 days a year.
Except on leap years, of course. Those years see even more real-life
testing happening!
On 09/04/11(Sat) 09:19, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Martin Pieuchot mpieuc...@nolizard.org
wrote:
Diff below add elf support to (bsd) strings(1) and make it usable for
architectures with ELF_TOOLCHAIN=Yes.
Wait, why? I don't get it. This seems out of scope
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:27:41AM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
Now, consider this: the fs code is very heavily tested. People use it 24
hours
a day, 365 days a year.
Except on leap years, of course. Those years see even more real-life
testing happening!
Good point. Maybe we should go to
No need to copy bugs@, tech@ and misc@. One is enough. I pick tech@.
There a few size_t vs ssize_t inconsistencies but this looks very
good for a start. I would suggest that as we are changing strtol and
atoi calls that we take the opportunity to replace them with strtonum
calls.
Ken
On
On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 11:20:09AM -0400, Steven R. Gerber wrote:
Hi folks.
Current rdist will timeout with files 2GB, log as finished, but will
not die.
The bug (system/6586) was originally noted by IBM (AIX) in 2006:
https://www-304.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1IY85396
I have
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011, Marc Espie wrote:
This is completely stupid.
What do you trust more ? your file system, or fsck ?
oth have bugs ! I'm sure of it !
so, if you run fsck, it's likely
you're going to run into fsck bugs eventually (and trying fsck on a mounted
partition was really, really
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 02:40:09PM +0200, David Vasek wrote:
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011, Marc Espie wrote:
This is completely stupid.
What do you trust more ? your file system, or fsck ?
oth have bugs ! I'm sure of it !
so, if you run fsck, it's likely
you're going to run into fsck bugs
while going through my wtmp with last(1) I noticed there could be a better
way than always gunzip'ing wtmp files and then using last -f. I've made
a patch for your consideration that does the following:
b) it writes the gzipped file to a /tmp location uncompressed so that the
normal
On 2011/04/10 10:08, Ian Darwin wrote:
while going through my wtmp with last(1) I noticed there could be a better
way than always gunzip'ing wtmp files and then using last -f. I've made
a patch for your consideration that does the following:
b) it writes the gzipped file to a /tmp
On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 03:21:40PM -0400, Steven R. Gerber wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/9/2011 1:04 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
When you print and off_t, for portability you should use:
%lld, (long long)offt
I'm a bit confused by the different
On 2011/04/06 23:52, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
Hi!
Merge viapm and viaenv
Pluse:
- Add support SMBus for VT82C596, VT82C596B, VT82C686A, VT8231
- Add support ACPI timer for all VIA South Bridges
Tested on:
- VT82C596B (Gigabyte GA-6VXE7+)
- VT82C686A (Neoware CA2)
- VT8231 (HP T5700)
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:32 AM, Martin Pieuchot mpieuc...@nolizard.org wrote:
Without the -a option strings(1) doesn't scan the file entirely [0].
I see, I never realized strings(1) handled executables specially... I
always assumed the -a behavior was the default anyway. My bad.
I would say
Queen I Queen
II Sheer Heart Attack A
Night The Opera A Day
At Races News Of The World Jazz
Like most people, I have my pet peeves. I consider that documentation
is very important to code quality.
I ran into a school-book example a week ago, so I decided to share what I
mean.
There was this problem with dpb where some packages in a MULTI_PACKAGES show
up as Errors when they don't
16 matches
Mail list logo
