On 2013/10/31 21:06, Arto Jonsson wrote:
Index: usr.bin/systat/systat.1
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/systat/systat.1,v
retrieving revision 1.96
diff -u -p -r1.96 systat.1
--- usr.bin/systat/systat.1 7 Sep 2013 11:43:50 -
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 10:45:16AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/10/31 21:06, Arto Jonsson wrote:
Index: usr.bin/systat/systat.1
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/systat/systat.1,v
retrieving revision 1.96
diff -u -p
- OpenBSD 5.4 RELEASED -
November 1, 2013.
We are pleased to announce the official release of OpenBSD 5.4.
This is our 34th release on CD-ROM (and 35th via FTP). We remain
commited, thanks!
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 04:30:51PM +0100, Anders Berggren wrote:
We tried to get pflow running in a non-default rdomain, and found this to get
it going. Make sense?
--- sys/net/if_pflow.c.orig Fri Sep 13 20:58:40 2013
+++ sys/net/if_pflow.cMon Sep 16 13:25:54
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Fresh wrote on Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 01:50:56PM -0700:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 08:31:58PM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
-'DISTRIBUTION' = 'DAGOLDEN/Module-Build-0.39_01.tar.gz',
+'DISTRIBUTION' = 'LEONT/Module-Build-0.4007.tar.gz',
It's only 4.003 in 5.18, not
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 04:56:04PM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
Oh well. To paraphase (forgive me if i misunderstand), It ought to
be easy to write something better than Module::Build, and even though
nobody has so far volunteered to propose an actual design, and even
less to write some code,
Diff below converts the three USB controllers to use a pool(9) for
allocating their transfer descriptors instead of maintaining their
own custom free list.
With it uhci(4) and ehci(4) no longer initialized the isdone value
to 1 for every new transfer descriptor (if DIAGNOSTIC is defined).
This is
Hello @tech
Congratulations for the 5.4 release.
I want to explain a draft to improve a little routing administration on
OpenBSD, maybe for 5.5.
There is a lack on routing daemon, the possibility to change routing
priorities for some protocols.
At this time routing priority is a dedicated
FreeBSD propose to have a specific routing table for a process, which is
even more powerful.
When the router has multiple gateway i guess when a source address is
choose the route should be chosen given that. Nothing more.
What use of this improvement do you imagine ?, of course you may want
this
Hello sven,
it's not a routing table problem, it's only a modification on route
priorities, it's not the same thing.
Here is my example at work:
I have BGP on the WAN, OSPF for my LAN (+ over GRE tunnels) and RIP to
my CISCO catalyst 45XX.
The problem is simple. I have two routers in this
Lo?c BLOT [loic.b...@unix-experience.fr] wrote:
Hello sven,
it's not a routing table problem, it's only a modification on route
priorities, it's not the same thing.
The two of you are solving totally different problems.
Here is my example at work:
I have BGP on the WAN, OSPF for my LAN (+
Hi,
Andrew Fresh wrote on Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 01:50:56PM -0700:
Post vBSDcon I have most existing patches working with 5.18.1, the only
failing so far is that with threads enabled
If i understand correctly, we do not currently have threads enabled
in our -current base perl 5.16, so that is
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 05:27:38AM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
Andrew Fresh wrote on Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 01:50:56PM -0700:
Post vBSDcon I have most existing patches working with 5.18.1, the only
failing so far is that with threads enabled
If i understand correctly, we do not currently
13 matches
Mail list logo