LibreSSL: GOST ciphers implementation

Hello, It took a while longer than I expected, but I think that the GOST ciphers implementation is complete now at https://github.com/libressl-portable/openbsd/pull/6 I still expect issues when Windows GOST CSP vendors will work on TLS 1.2 implementation (up to now they only provide TLS 1.0).

Re: armv7: banana pi, Allwinner A20 board

On Thu, October 16, 2014 11:40 pm, Patrick Wildt wrote: I do believe that this is a pmap issue. I just got hands on an Allwinner A20 and suffered the same issues: pool_setlowat crashing randomly, same for ahci and so on. I believe we are not syncing the PTEs correctly. Here?s the snippet

have softraid crypto call crypto_dispatch appropriately instead of

i had a test install i could sacrifice, so i gave it a shot. this install had -current base installed. i booted the patched kernel, and installed comp56.tgz. everything seemed to work fine. rebooted into my non-test install, mounted the test crypto partition, and sha1'd every hundredth file and

Re: have softraid crypto call crypto_dispatch appropriately instead of

On 20 Oct 2014, at 9:15 pm, thev...@openmailbox.org wrote: i had a test install i could sacrifice, so i gave it a shot. this install had -current base installed. i booted the patched kernel, and installed comp56.tgz. everything seemed to work fine. rebooted into my non-test install,

let crypto.c pools protect themselves

tested this with your other patch. i applied both patches to the kernel at the same time, so test results the same as with the other patch (good for softraid at least). On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 10:49:35 +1000 David Gwynne da...@gwynne.id.au wrote: pools lock themselves, we just gotta tell them how

Re: LibreSSL: GOST ciphers implementation

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 01:57:44PM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: Hello, It took a while longer than I expected, but I think that the GOST ciphers implementation is complete now at https://github.com/libressl-portable/openbsd/pull/6 I still expect issues when Windows GOST CSP

Re: pppoe(4), add example for ipv6

Any comments on the diff in this? On 2014/10/08 13:31, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2014/10/08 11:10, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 11:42:10PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: On 07/10/14 10:03 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: Since it's non-obvious how to setup pppoe for v6 now that

Re: pppoe(4), add example for ipv6

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 01:22:05PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: Any comments on the diff in this? Not sure why you're singling out pppoe(4). Don't other interfaces that use sppp's IPv6CP have the same problem? Are there no others? Generally, I think it would be better to keep IPv6 disabled by

select(2) to poll(2) conversion for mountd(8)

Hi everyone, I've tested this on my home setup and it seems to work. Let me know if anything else needs working. Cheers, Dimitris === RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/mountd/mountd.c,v retrieving revision 1.76 diff -u -p -r1.76 mountd.c

Re: pppoe(4), add example for ipv6

On 2014/10/20 14:49, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 01:22:05PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: Any comments on the diff in this? Not sure why you're singling out pppoe(4). Don't other interfaces that use sppp's IPv6CP have the same problem? Are there no others? ah, good

Re: select(2) to poll(2) conversion for mountd(8)

This looks correct and matches what svc_run() does. - todd

Re: Shadow TCP stacks

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote: You are off-topic for this mailing list. Please go discuss it elsewhere. Theo, Does this include my questions on tech? I still want to do this, even of a hundred little pricks don't understand what it is. I think I

Re: Shadow TCP stacks

Please take it elsewhere until you have something more than words. And when you have more than words, please put it on a a web site and do nothing more than tell people once. Ian, you are abusing these forums, and you know it. Show some damn respect for the number of people on the receiving end