On 2014/10/20 14:49, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 01:22:05PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > Any comments on the diff in this? > > Not sure why you're singling out pppoe(4). Don't other interfaces > that use sppp's IPv6CP have the same problem? Are there no others?
ah, good point, the others are lmc(4) and san(4). > Generally, I think it would be better to keep IPv6 disabled by default and > apply the documentation change you proposed when starting this discussion. already done for pppoe(4). san(4) and lmc(4) don't say much about the ppp layer, and sppp(4) doesn't talk about v6 at all.
