On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 04:04:33PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 10:57:41 +0100
> > From: Martin Pieuchot
> >
> > If it's acceptable performance-wise to do the check unconditionally I
> > believe that's the way to go. If not I'm a bit afraid of
On 04/01/16(Mon) 10:34, Devin Reade wrote:
> This patch adds kernel support for the OneRNG hardware random number
> generator, which is similar to ualea(4). onerng(4) is configured to
> deliver ~319kb/s of true randomness.
>
> Since usbdevs.h and usbdevs_data.h are generated files, it's not
On 3.1.2016. 21:26, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> i accidentally managed to trigger em watchdog timeout -- resetting on my
> test box which is clean -current from today at 20:00 CET.
> Test box is IBM X3550M4 with 4 onboard em I350 (em0,em1,em2,em3) and 2
> ix (ix2,ix3) 82599 interfaces.
Hi Ted,
Ted Unangst wrote on Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 11:51:34AM -0500:
> Neither strftime nor strptime describe the fields inside struct tm,
> and while they eventually point that way in references, strftime
> provides no guidance as to which of its nine (9!) references
> I should read next. I
These are FreeBSD commits 731fe330c9 and 739c57d8c2. A request from what
appears to be the author himself prompted these changes:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196786
And a comment in the source files of these tools verifies the authorship:
* Author: John Kunze, Office
The first diff explains what happens to a word longer than 'width'. This
diff comes from NetBSD and FreeBSD. The explanation is quite
complicated and I couldn't understand what this flag does at first, the
source code makes it much clearer (the variable is called split_words).
But I didn't change
Below the uiomove conversion for isofs/cd9660/cd9660_vnops.c.
cheers,
natano
Index: isofs/cd9660/cd9660_vnops.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/isofs/cd9660/cd9660_vnops.c,v
retrieving revision 1.73
diff -u -p -r1.73 cd9660_vnops.c
---
Below a diff to convert i386/nvram.c to use uiomove(). A similar diff
for amd64 has already been committed. (See
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech=142860367111291) Also, pos is
converted to off_t for both amd64 and i386 to prevent truncation and
signedness mismatch. Calling nvramread() with a
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 11:48:10AM +, Juuso Lapinlampi wrote:
> Here's a revised patch that updates the $Mdocdate if seemed necessary.
Thanks. I like the first version of your patch, it's a good point.
There's no need to update $Mdocdate$ manually. This is taken care of
when the patch is
On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 06:27:29PM +0100, Marcus MERIGHI wrote:
> When the text is not talking about filters, but about accept/reject
> rules and using the term "filter", try to find some other wording.
>
> Bye, Marcus
>
committed, thanks
> Index: smtpd.conf.5
>
Here's a revised patch that updates the $Mdocdate if seemed necessary.
Ok?
Index: getopt.3
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/stdlib/getopt.3,v
retrieving revision 1.44
diff -u -p -r1.44 getopt.3
--- getopt.321 Jan 2014 03:15:45
style(9) revision 1.61 updated the guidelines, and mentions the only
lint-style comment that should be used is FALLTHROUGH.
Ok?
Index: getopt.3
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/stdlib/getopt.3,v
retrieving revision 1.44
diff -u -p
> /*
> - * These parameters control when the driver calls the routine to reclaim
> - * transmit descriptors.
> + * Thise parameter controls the minimum number of available transmit
> + * descriptors needed before we attempt transmission of a packet.
> */
There seems to be a typo in there.
Hello,
Holidays are over, I'm getting back to this diff, anyone is ok with it?
Martin Natano wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the diff reads fine to me, except for following nit-picks: It would be
> nice if the hashfree() function would check for negative/zero element
> counts, like hashinit() does. Also, new
Hi,
Michal Mazurek wrote on Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 09:08:58PM +0100:
> These are FreeBSD commits 731fe330c9 and 739c57d8c2. A request
> from what appears to be the author himself prompted these changes:
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196786
> And a comment in the source files
On Sun, 3 Jan 2016, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >On Friday 01 January 2016 16:25:59, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >> dlg writes:
> >> > should we just do it unconditionally? is there a downside to that?
> >
> >It may decrease performance a tiny bit. Since such bits tend to add
> >up, I would be hesitant to
> Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 21:30:31 +0100
> From: Claudio Jeker
>
> On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 04:04:33PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 10:57:41 +0100
> > > From: Martin Pieuchot
> > >
> > > If it's acceptable performance-wise to
Hi,
Michal Mazurek wrote on Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 08:27:50PM +0100:
> Fold line after the last blank character within the first
> .Ar width
> column positions (or bytes).
> +If a blank character does not exist within the width, then
> +a longer line will still be split at the width.
> The
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 05:16:57PM +0100, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> Slight change in that lenght wasn't always preserved in msg.c.
> This revision works well for me and millert@
>
The diff looks good to me and the only remark I have is that
catalog/README should be updated as well.
Nobody
On 01:24:35, 5.01.16, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> +If an output line would be broken after a non-blank character but
> +contains at least one blank character, break the line earlier,
> +after the last blank character.
> +This is useful to avoid line breaks in the middle of words, if
> +possible.
I'm sorry for delay.
ok yasuoka
tested.
On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 10:55:14 -0800
Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Dec 2015, Todd C. Miller wrote:
>> On Fri, 04 Dec 2015 09:47:46 -0800, Philip Guenther wrote:
>> > We should fix open(2); please try the diff below. Are you sure
Mark Kettenis writes:
> OpenBSD/amd64 and OpenBSD/i386 have been supporting multiple
> wsdisplay(4) devices for a while now. Somewhat recently it became
> also possible to use inteldrm(4) as a secondary display device. There
> have always been some issues with pairing
Hello,
I've written some code which basically allows to emulate the behavior of
starttls-enabled clients and servers via nc(1). I mainly use it for
debugging purposes since it is more generic than openssl s_client
-starttls. However, the solution is probably ugly since I'm not very
Slight change in that lenght wasn't always preserved in msg.c.
This revision works well for me and millert@
On 12/16/15 17:43, Martijn van Duren wrote:
ping
On 12/02/15 20:36, Martijn van Duren wrote:
Hello tech@,
I've had a discussion with bentley@ about some patches for vi. Some of
which
Thanks for your feedback, Martin. See below.
--On Monday, January 04, 2016 08:02:34 PM +0100 Martin Pieuchot
wrote:
On 04/01/16(Mon) 10:34, Devin Reade wrote:
This patch adds kernel support for the OneRNG hardware random number
generator, which is similar to ualea(4).
On Mon, 4 Jan 2016, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 04:04:33PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 10:57:41 +0100
> > > From: Martin Pieuchot
> > >
> > > If it's acceptable performance-wise to do the check unconditionally I
> > > believe
On 04/01/16(Mon) 14:53, Devin Reade wrote:
> --On Monday, January 04, 2016 08:02:34 PM +0100 Martin Pieuchot
> wrote:
> [...]
> An earlier version of the code (not submitted) matched on only vendor
> and product, but I was seeing onerng_match being invoked twice; one for
> the
This patch adds kernel support for the OneRNG hardware random number
generator, which is similar to ualea(4). onerng(4) is configured to
deliver ~319kb/s of true randomness.
Since usbdevs.h and usbdevs_data.h are generated files, it's not clear
to me that they are supposed to be part of the
On 01/03/16 16:00, Mark Kettenis wrote:
OpenBSD/amd64 and OpenBSD/i386 have been supporting multiple
wsdisplay(4) devices for a while now. Somewhat recently it became
also possible to use inteldrm(4) as a secondary display device. There
have always been some issues with pairing wskbd(4)
Hi Todd,
Todd C. Miller wrote on Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 10:46:08AM -0700:
> On Fri, 25 Dec 2015 00:30:29 +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>> Besides, i don't see the point in messing with FILE flags at all
>> in case of encoding errors. As opposed to fgetwc(3) and fputwc(3),
>> the manual doesn't
30 matches
Mail list logo