Michael McConville wrote:
> Michael McConville wrote:
> > Does this make sense?
>
> I just realized that the allocation failure checks earlier in the
> function return ENOBUFS. This probably makes more sense for the sake of
> consistency.
The best I can tell, the only use of this function is in
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 7:33 AM, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> This diff removes the "symbol table" argument of the functions dealing
> with symbols. While here keep the definition of ``db_symtab'' private
> because we only have one global symbol table.
I'm a fairly active ddb
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> since ARMv6 the coprocessor provides special registers to store software
> defined values. Those registers are:
>
> * TPIDRURW -> kernel RW, user RW
> * TPIDRURO -> kernel RW, user RO
> * TPIDRPRW -> kernel RW
>
>
Sorry, the second message was not supposed to go to the list...
The concept of differentiating between "short" and "long" symlinks is
specific to ufs/, but the relevant variable is contained in struct
mount, which is used by all filesystems. I think it would be a worthwile
effort to clear this up by moving maxsymlinklen to struct ufsmount
instead. Filesystem
Hello Todd, Stefan,
this is the logical continuation of the previous maxsymlinklen diff. At
least in my mind it is logical. ;)
I have a dream that one day filesystem code will be actually readable
and changeable without being a UFS lawyer.
I would appreciate if you could have a look at this.
There is no emulation "bsd". Our default is "native".
Index: kdump.1
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/kdump/kdump.1,v
retrieving revision 1.27
diff -u -p -r1.27 kdump.1
--- kdump.1 2 Oct 2015 19:12:45 - 1.27
+++ kdump.1
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 09:55:35PM +0100, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> bluhm proposed to add M_UDP_CSUM_OUT to the mbuf csum flags. I just
> tried his proposal and it looks like the following diff works.
Yes, also OK bluhm@ for this.
> diff --git sys/netinet/ipsec_output.c sys/netinet/ipsec_output.c
>
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 08:25:02PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 04:56:49PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> > I think your revised diff should be committed. Any objections?
>
> OK bluhm@
>
> > > uh->uh_sum = 0;
> > > +#ifdef INET6
> > > + if
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 04:56:49PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> I think your revised diff should be committed. Any objections?
OK bluhm@
> > uh->uh_sum = 0;
> > +#ifdef INET6
> > + if (tdb->tdb_dst.sa.sa_family == AF_INET6)
> > + uh->uh_sum =
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 02:17:18AM +0100, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote:
>
> - a few *cnt members of struct rainfo aren't used for anything
> - the SIOCGIFPREFIX_IN6 ioctl has been deprecated since June 2002
> - prefix_match() and in6a_site_allrouters are remnants from the
> Renumbering
Michael McConville wrote:
> Does this make sense?
I just realized that the allocation failure checks earlier in the
function return ENOBUFS. This probably makes more sense for the sake of
consistency.
> Index: sys/crypto/cryptosoft.c
>
Does this make sense?
Index: sys/crypto/cryptosoft.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/crypto/cryptosoft.c,v
retrieving revision 1.80
diff -u -p -r1.80 cryptosoft.c
--- sys/crypto/cryptosoft.c 10 Dec 2015 21:00:51 - 1.80
+++
On 26/02/2016 16:53, Sevan Janiyan wrote:
> in my hostname.if I have
> !/sbin/route add -net 192.168.0.1 -netmask 255.255.255.255 -link
> -cloning -iface vio0
> !/sbin/route add default -ifa 10.0.0.1 192.168.0.1
>
> Which works.
To clarify
192.168.0.1 is the address assigned to my interface
On 26/02/2016 16:38, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> hostname.em0:
>
> inet 92.224.149.DDD/32
> ! route add 91.224.148.0/32 -link -iface em0
in my hostname.if I have
!/sbin/route add -net 192.168.0.1 -netmask 255.255.255.255 -link
-cloning -iface vio0
!/sbin/route add default -ifa 10.0.0.1
Hi,
My hosting ISP is using a routing model where every machine has
a IP address with a /32 mask and uses a default route specificed at
the link level.
For Linux machines it means something like this with iproute2:
ip link set eth0 up
ip addr add 91.224.149.DDD/32 dev eth0
ip route add
Ingo Schwarze said:
> I will post a selection of the most important diffs here, but in order
> to not overwhelm the list, not all of them. If you like to see all of
> them, please tell me privately and you'll be in the loop.
FWIW if individual diffs are not going to be reviewed one-by-one in the
On 2016/02/26 16:31, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 09:17:16AM -0600, Chris Bennett wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 07:56:54PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > Chris, you continue to amaze me.
> > >
> > > Upon running sysmerge, that will break everyone's setup.
> > >
> > >
Hi Patrick,
I think your revised diff should be committed. Any objections?
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 15:12 +0100, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> Bump with updated diff, now that tree is unlocked again.
>
> Patrick
>
> diff --git sys/netinet/ipsec_output.c sys/netinet/ipsec_output.c
> index
I'm currently working on a kernel subsystem to dynamically instrument
kernel functions. For that I'm heavily using ddb(4) code.
Now I would like to prevent ddb(4) functions to be instrumented or
depend on instrumented functions. So I'm slowly making an audit to
reduce the amount of external
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 09:17:16AM -0600, Chris Bennett wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 07:56:54PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > Chris, you continue to amaze me.
> >
> > Upon running sysmerge, that will break everyone's setup.
> >
> > Like, can you try stuff before you send it out?
> >
> >
This diff removes the "symbol table" argument of the functions dealing
with symbols. While here keep the definition of ``db_symtab'' private
because we only have one global symbol table.
ok?
Index: ddb/db_elf.c
===
RCS file:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 07:56:54PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Chris, you continue to amaze me.
>
> Upon running sysmerge, that will break everyone's setup.
>
> Like, can you try stuff before you send it out?
>
> I'm done.
>
> > /etc/examples/printcap doesn't match
> > #define
Bump, now that the tree is unlocked again.
Patrick
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 10:49:36PM +0100, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since ARMv6 the coprocessor provides special registers to store software
> defined values. Those registers are:
>
> * TPIDRURW -> kernel RW, user RW
> * TPIDRURO ->
Bump with updated diff, now that tree is unlocked again.
Patrick
diff --git sys/netinet/ipsec_output.c sys/netinet/ipsec_output.c
index 91c319f..18a3f57 100644
--- sys/netinet/ipsec_output.c
+++ sys/netinet/ipsec_output.c
@@ -375,13 +375,30 @@ ipsp_process_done(struct mbuf *m, struct tdb *tdb)
i am going to make setting the IPL mandantory for pools.
eventually, the IPL will be set in pool_init, but the first step
toward that is to actually set it on every pool.
i just finished this. it compiles and boots on sparc64, but more
eyes and tests would be appreciated.
dlg
Index:
Hi,
i have begun an audit of libedit. I will post a selection of the
most important diffs here, but in order to not overwhelm the list,
not all of them. If you like to see all of them, please tell me
privately and you'll be in the loop. Actually, i'd love it if one
or two additional people
On 25/02/16(Thu) 11:39, Mike Larkin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 03:05:21PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> [...]
> > - return 0;
> > + return db_elf_sym_lookup(_symtab, symstr);
> > }
>
> From what I can tell, db_lookup is only called one time in the tree.
> Rather than replace
28 matches
Mail list logo