On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Martin Natano wrote:
> This should do it. The 'fix' is ugly, but I couldn't find a cleaner way
> to pass the right STRIP value to libtool. Any better ideas? Ok?
...
> --- gnu/usr.bin/binutils-2.17/Makefile.bsd-wrapper 11 Sep 2016 07:42:02
> - 1.9
> +
Theo de Raadt [dera...@openbsd.org] wrote:
> > That rebound acts like a nameserver is what prompted the idea to
> > hijack the resolver. But it's really a tool that takes over certain
> > duties from the libc resolver, so the libc resolver should be properly
> > configurable to hand over duties, or
Ted Unangst wrote:
> So the plan is for rebound to be the 'system' resolver, with libc talking to
> rbeound and rebound talking to the cloud. The main wrinkle is how does rebound
> find the cloud? rebound.conf, but dhclient doesn't know anything about
> rebound.conf, preferring to edit resolv.conf.
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 09:27:00PM +, Ivan Markin wrote:
> Jason McIntyre:
> > ...then isn't it covered by the notes already attached to "interface"?
> >
> > Otherwise all interfaces of the same type will be displayed (for
> > example, ``fxp'' will display all fxp(4) interfaces).
>
>
Jason McIntyre:
> Otherwise all interfaces of the same type will be displayed (for
> example, ``fxp'' will display all fxp(4) interfaces).
btw, what is called here 'type' is actually 'name' from above. I.e. it's
driver type, not a generic type (which is 'rdomain').
--
Ivan Markin
Jason McIntyre:
> ...then isn't it covered by the notes already attached to "interface"?
>
> Otherwise all interfaces of the same type will be displayed (for
> example, ``fxp'' will display all fxp(4) interfaces).
Right, it seems to be. But is 'rdomain' a type? We'll get 255 new
inte
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 09:10:00PM +, Ivan Markin wrote:
> Jason McIntyre:
> > i think the "group" description of ifconfig(8) would be the more logical
> > place to document this.
>
> Even if it is not a real group? 'rdomain' pseudogroup is only used to
> display interfaces. One can't actually
Jason McIntyre:
> i think the "group" description of ifconfig(8) would be the more logical
> place to document this.
Even if it is not a real group? 'rdomain' pseudogroup is only used to
display interfaces. One can't actually consider it as a group.
--
Ivan Markin
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 08:52:00PM +, Ivan Markin wrote:
> Hi tech@,
>
> After some struggling with manual looking for the interfaces attached to
> particular rdomain, I added such option to ifconfig(8). So now it
> behaves like there is a 'group' for each rdomain.
>
>
i think the "group" d
> install: strip: No such file or directory
>
> Is there a better option than removing it again?
>
>
> $ cd /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils-2.17
> $ doas make -f Makefile.bsd-wapper install
> [...]
> Making install in po
> test -z "/usr/bin" || /bin/sh
> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils-2.17/binutil
Hi tech@,
After some struggling with manual looking for the interfaces attached to
particular rdomain, I added such option to ifconfig(8). So now it
behaves like there is a 'group' for each rdomain.
Index: ifconfig.8
===
RCS file: /
> That rebound acts like a nameserver is what prompted the idea to
> hijack the resolver. But it's really a tool that takes over certain
> duties from the libc resolver, so the libc resolver should be properly
> configurable to hand over duties, or not. 'search' is the logical
> place for this.
So
On Thu, 15 Sep 2016, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> That rebound acts like a nameserver is what prompted the idea to
> hijack the resolver. But it's really a tool that takes over certain
> duties from the libc resolver, so the libc resolver should be properly
> configurable to hand over duties, or not.
Bryan Steele [bry...@gmail.com] wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:14:51AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > Florian Obser wrote:
> > > Not everything listening on localhost port 53 is a recursive resolver.
> > > nsd(8) per defaults listens on 0.0.0.0 and will respond with REFUSED for
> > > almost eve
On 2016 Sep 15 (Thu) at 14:47:24 +0200 (+0200), Peter Hessler wrote:
:On 2016 Sep 15 (Thu) at 13:28:10 +0200 (+0200), Martin Pieuchot wrote:
::On 14/09/16(Wed) 15:50, Peter Hessler wrote:
::> +
::> + bfd = pool_get(&bfd_pool_msghdr, PR_WAITOK | PR_ZERO);
::
::This doesn't make sense you're alloca
Theo Buehler writes:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 07:01:20PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
>> On Sat, 10 Sep 2016, Philip Guenther wrote:
>> > Same diff as binutils, with same open question:
>> >
>> > > Maybe we should add ${INSTALL_STRIP} to the INSTALL_PROGRAM assignment
>> > > here?
>>
>> Here
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 07:01:20PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2016, Philip Guenther wrote:
> > Same diff as binutils, with same open question:
> >
> > > Maybe we should add ${INSTALL_STRIP} to the INSTALL_PROGRAM assignment
> > > here?
>
> Here's the combined diff that does t
Antoine,
I've been following this thread and noted that you did add _rc_check_name
to rc.subr and call it in rcctl. This looks clean and comprehensive. Two
thoughts, however:
1. I had to look at the pattern match in _rc_check_name for a while
before I understood it; the suggestion below makes
Hello -
Here is another diff to switch some bcopy's to memcpy's.
Most bcopy's are on freshly alloc'd memory.
for netinet/
Index: ip_ah.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/netinet/ip_ah.c,v
retrieving revision 1.122
diff -u -p -r1.122 ip_ah
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 02:57:16PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> [...]
> I think this is the right way to work around the problem and make
> video(1) more user-friendly. However, I doubt that the manpage bits are
> relevant. So I'd like to commit only the .c diff.
>
> Thoughts?
> [...
On 2016/09/15 06:23, Jiri B wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:04:00AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > What about this:
> > >
> > > Add "rebound" as possible value to the lookup keyword in resolv.conf.
> > > If this is set the libc resolver sends dns requests to the unix socket
> > > /var/ru
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:14:51AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Florian Obser wrote:
> > Not everything listening on localhost port 53 is a recursive resolver.
> > nsd(8) per defaults listens on 0.0.0.0 and will respond with REFUSED for
> > almost every query. asr stops in that case and does not try
On 2016 Sep 15 (Thu) at 16:18:46 +0200 (+0200), Henning Brauer wrote:
:* Peter Hessler [2016-09-15 14:48]:
:> On 2016 Sep 15 (Thu) at 13:28:10 +0200 (+0200), Martin Pieuchot wrote:
:> :By the way 'softc' is generally for device drivers, you might prefer
:> :something like bfdd (d for descriptor).
After discussing with a few people about a new "timed task" API I came
to the conclusion that mixing timeouts and tasks will result in:
- always including a 'struct timeout' in a 'struct task', or the other
the way around
or
- introducing a new data structure, hence API.
Since I'd like
* Ted Unangst [2016-09-15 16:15]:
> The good news is I think we can still bind to
> localhost:53 if nsd is on *:53 (right?).
right.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services GmbH, http://bsws.de, Full-Service ISP
Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS. Virtual & Dedicated Serve
* Peter Hessler [2016-09-15 14:48]:
> On 2016 Sep 15 (Thu) at 13:28:10 +0200 (+0200), Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> :By the way 'softc' is generally for device drivers, you might prefer
> :something like bfdd (d for descriptor).
> There's be a whole lot of bikeshedding about this topic, I would prefer
Florian Obser wrote:
> Not everything listening on localhost port 53 is a recursive resolver.
> nsd(8) per defaults listens on 0.0.0.0 and will respond with REFUSED for
> almost every query. asr stops in that case and does not try the next
> resolver in the list.
Ah! There's the catch. The good ne
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 12:53:05PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
>
> > Daniel Micay wrote:
> > >
> > > The current OpenBSD code only wipes up to MALLOC_MAXCHUNK with junk @ 1,
> > > and it similarly doesn't wipe at all with 'U' (even though junk-on-free
> > > also serves the pu
> :By the way 'softc' is generally for device drivers, you might prefer
> :something like bfdd (d for descriptor).
>
> There's be a whole lot of bikeshedding about this topic, I would prefer
> not to change it for now.
It should be changed. mpi is right. That variable naming should only
refer p
Gregor Best writes:
> Hi,
Hi,
> video(1) fails to read files that were previously recorded with -o
> somefile, unless -g (to select read(2) as the input method) is also
> specified:
>
>$ video -o foo
>^C
>$ video -i foo
>video: ioctl VIDIOC_REQBUFS: Bad file descriptor
>$ vi
On 2016 Sep 15 (Thu) at 13:28:10 +0200 (+0200), Martin Pieuchot wrote:
:On 14/09/16(Wed) 15:50, Peter Hessler wrote:
:> This is a work-in-progress diff that I would like to commit. I can print
:> a few things, but there is a problem when trying to bring in more
:> fields. Printing is also ugly, b
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 09:19:07PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> So the plan is for rebound to be the 'system' resolver, with libc talking to
> rbeound and rebound talking to the cloud. The main wrinkle is how does rebound
> find the cloud? rebound.conf, but dhclient doesn't know anything about
> reb
Thanks for noticing this!
Here's an updated diff. I also included Hardware Duty Cycling (HDC) tests.
Index: arch/amd64/include/specialreg.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/arch/amd64/include/specialreg.h,v
retrieving revision 1.48
diff -
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:04:00AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2016/09/15 10:39, Remi Locherer wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 08:10:29PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > > > wont this also mean if it is not running i have to wait for the
> > > > > localhost
> > > > > attempt to fail b
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 01:42:33PM +0300, Paul Irofti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The following diff adds checks for Package Thermal Management and
> Hardware P-states in the Thermal and Power Management CPUID Leaf.
>
> I also added the the Hardware P-States MSRs for a Skylake firmware fix
> that I will sen
On 14/09/16(Wed) 15:50, Peter Hessler wrote:
> This is a work-in-progress diff that I would like to commit. I can print
> a few things, but there is a problem when trying to bring in more
> fields. Printing is also ugly, but I can fix that in-tree.
Well you're mixing multiples things in one diff
Hi,
The following diff adds checks for Package Thermal Management and
Hardware P-states in the Thermal and Power Management CPUID Leaf.
I also added the the Hardware P-States MSRs for a Skylake firmware fix
that I will send later toady. I don't mind if that should go in a separate
commit.
Tested
On 2016/09/15 10:39, Remi Locherer wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 08:10:29PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > > wont this also mean if it is not running i have to wait for the
> > > > localhost
> > > > attempt to fail before the resolver moves on? (ASR_STATE_NEXT_NS, etc)
> > > > so i
> > > >
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 08:10:29PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > wont this also mean if it is not running i have to wait for the localhost
> > > attempt to fail before the resolver moves on? (ASR_STATE_NEXT_NS, etc) so
> > > i
> > > slow everything down for a timeout?
> >
> > Not if he connec
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 09:19:07PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> And so I present the following diff to enable a smooth transition. It's
> 'quantum' because it works whether or not rebound is running. No need to open
> the box.
I'm sure there's a cat(ch)...
--
Erling Westenvik
Sorry, I attached wrong patch file.
I re-post the patch file again.
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 04:10:55PM +0900, Kinichiro Inoguchi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to fix this SNI issue.
>
> reported by @davidben
> https://github.com/libressl-portable/openbsd/issues/69
>
> #3560: OpenSSL selects wea
> Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 14:53:14 +1000
> From: Jonathan Gray
>
> It turns out on OMAP4/OMAP5 there is a "Wake-up generator"
> interrupt controller that routes interrupts to the GIC and does power
> management comparable to imx with the i.MX6 General Power Controller
> (GPC).
>
> / {
> #addr
Hi,
I would like to fix this SNI issue.
reported by @davidben
https://github.com/libressl-portable/openbsd/issues/69
#3560: OpenSSL selects weak digest for (EC)DH
https://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=3560
original OpenSSL commit is here.
https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=
RBT_PROTOTYPE needs to be able to see RBT_HEAD, so this shuffles
the headers a bit.
otherwise it just maps RB code to RBT.
ok?
Index: sys/buf.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/sys/buf.h,v
retrieving revision 1.103
diff -u -p -r1.103 buf.
44 matches
Mail list logo
