Re: ospf(6)d: check rdomain for depend on interfaces

2019-04-29 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 10:23:02PM +0200, Sebastian Benoit wrote: > Remi Locherer(remi.loche...@relo.ch) on 2019.04.28 11:43:41 +0200: > > Hi, > > > > the parser in ospf(6)d accepts depend on interfaces that are in a > > different rdomain. This works on startup of the daemon. But since it > > filt

Re: Conditional sysupgrade

2019-04-29 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2019/04/29 00:21, Marco Bonetti wrote: > > > +++ usr.sbin/sysupgrade/sysupgrade.sh 27 Apr 2019 11:54:48 - > > > @@ -110,7 +110,19 @@ fi > > > > > > cd ${SETSDIR} > > > > > > -unpriv -f SHA256.sig ftp -Vmo SHA256.sig ${URL}SHA256.sig > > > +unpriv -f SHA256.sig.tmp ftp -Vmo SHA256.si

Re: ospfd: allow specifying area by number as well as id

2019-04-29 Thread David Gwynne
> On 29 Apr 2019, at 4:59 pm, Remi Locherer wrote: > > Hi David > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 11:53:27AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote: >> it's always bothered me that i config areas on a crisco using a number, >> but then have to think hard to convert that number to an address for use >> in openbs

Re: ospfd: allow specifying area by number as well as id

2019-04-29 Thread Sebastian Benoit
David Gwynne(da...@gwynne.id.au) on 2019.04.29 19:36:51 +1000: > > > > On 29 Apr 2019, at 4:59 pm, Remi Locherer wrote: > > > > Hi David > > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 11:53:27AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote: > >> it's always bothered me that i config areas on a crisco using a number, > >> but t

Re: ospfd: allow specifying area by number as well as id

2019-04-29 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2019/04/29 11:58, Sebastian Benoit wrote: > David Gwynne(da...@gwynne.id.au) on 2019.04.29 19:36:51 +1000: > > > > > > > On 29 Apr 2019, at 4:59 pm, Remi Locherer wrote: > > > > > > Hi David > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 11:53:27AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote: > > >> it's always bothere

Re: ospfd: allow specifying area by number as well as id

2019-04-29 Thread Alexander Bluhm
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 11:53:27AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote: > it's always bothered me that i config areas on a crisco using a number, > but then have to think hard to convert that number to an address for use > in openbsd. eg, i was given area 700 in one place, which is 0.0.2.188 > as an address.

Re: [patch] cwm: filter duplicate hostnames in ssh menu

2019-04-29 Thread Okan Demirmen
On Fri 2019.04.26 at 07:15 +0200, Bruno Fl?ckiger wrote: > Hi, > > The ssh menu of cwm(1) doesn't filter duplicated hostnames when reading > them from ~/.ssh/known_hosts. This patch makes sure each hostname is > only displayed once to the menu. Sure, maybe; but why again do we even have this insi

Re: ospfd: allow specifying area by number as well as id

2019-04-29 Thread Gregory Edigarov
On 29.04.19 04:53, David Gwynne wrote: it's always bothered me that i config areas on a crisco using a number, but then have to think hard to convert that number to an address for use in openbsd. eg, i was given area 700 in one place, which is 0.0.2.188 as an address. super annoying. so this c

Re: ld.so speedup (part 2)

2019-04-29 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2019/04/28 09:45, Brian Callahan wrote: > > > On 4/28/19 6:01 AM, Matthieu Herrb wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 08:55:16AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 09:55:33PM +0800, Nathanael Rensen wrote: > > > > > > > > The diff below speeds up ld.so library i

Re: ld.so speedup (part 2)

2019-04-29 Thread Chris Cappuccio
Stuart Henderson [s...@spacehopper.org] wrote: > > This doesn't match my experience: > > $ time sudo rcctl start samba > smbd(ok) > nmbd(ok) > 0m00.81s real 0m00.31s user 0m00.31s system He was linking Samba with Kerberos libs too.

Re: ld.so speedup (part 2)

2019-04-29 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2019/04/29 09:47, Chris Cappuccio wrote: > Stuart Henderson [s...@spacehopper.org] wrote: > > > > This doesn't match my experience: > > > > $ time sudo rcctl start samba > > smbd(ok) > > nmbd(ok) > > 0m00.81s real 0m00.31s user 0m00.31s system > > He was linking Samba with Kerbero

Re: update to PF pfctl(8) and pf.conf(5) manpages

2019-04-29 Thread Alexandr Nedvedicky
Hello, sorry for extra delay. > i have to say upfront that i dislike this idea of dividing options into > classes and then for every option, altering the text to something > unwieldy like: > > This runtime option... > > it reads very poorly, and this page is big enough as is without fles

Re: update to PF pfctl(8) and pf.conf(5) manpages

2019-04-29 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 07:48:35PM +0200, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote: > Hello, > > sorry for extra delay. > > > > i have to say upfront that i dislike this idea of dividing options into > > classes and then for every option, altering the text to something > > unwieldy like: > > > > This runt

Re: update to PF pfctl(8) and pf.conf(5) manpages

2019-04-29 Thread Alexandr Nedvedicky
Hello, comments inline. > > +section 'OPTIONS', for details. > > probably just > > See > .Xr pf.conf.5 > .Sx OPTIONS > for details. fixed > > Set the debug > > .Ar level , > > @@ -1165,6 +1168,11 @@ and > > These keywords correspond to the similar (LOG_) value

Re: update to PF pfctl(8) and pf.conf(5) manpages

2019-04-29 Thread Alexandr Nedvedicky
Hello, hit sent too fast... attaching updated diff this time. thanks and regards sashan 8<---8<---8<--8< diff --git a/sbin/pfctl/pfctl.8 b/sbin/pfctl/pfctl.8 index b7e941991ba..5e2c57f6bc2 100644 --- a/sbin/pfctl/pfctl.8 +++ b/sbin/pfctl/p

Re: update to PF pfctl(8) and pf.conf(5) manpages

2019-04-29 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 08:55:40PM +0200, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote: > > > @@ -1165,6 +1168,11 @@ and > > > These keywords correspond to the similar (LOG_) values specified to the > > > .Xr syslog 3 > > > library routine. > > > +The default value is > > > +.Cm err . > > > +.Xr pfctl 8 > > > +.Fl

Re: Conditional sysupgrade

2019-04-29 Thread Marco Bonetti
On 04/29, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2019/04/29 00:21, Marco Bonetti wrote: > > > > +++ usr.sbin/sysupgrade/sysupgrade.sh 27 Apr 2019 11:54:48 - > > > > @@ -110,7 +110,19 @@ fi > > > > > > > > cd ${SETSDIR} > > > > > > > > -unpriv -f SHA256.sig ftp -Vmo SHA256.sig ${URL}SHA256.sig > >

Re: update to PF pfctl(8) and pf.conf(5) manpages

2019-04-29 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 08:59:55PM +0200, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote: > attaching updated diff this time. Lots of good stuff, thanks! I'm sold on mentioning the various defaults but not quite sure yet whether it's worthwhile to vary on "pfctl -F Reset restores the default" over and over again (I co