Hi,
Consolidate error paths in usbd_new_device, shaving of 14 lines.
Comments? OK?
diff --git sys/dev/usb/usb_subr.c sys/dev/usb/usb_subr.c
index a11bc448ece..74fe4c3b4db 100644
--- sys/dev/usb/usb_subr.c
+++ sys/dev/usb/usb_subr.c
@@ -1086,11 +1086,8 @@ usbd_new_device(struct device *parent, str
Hi,
I've tested the second diff (containing the bug fix and I get a lock
order reversal on bootup. On the first patch I was getting the same
lock order reversal while using X and sometimes (only sometimes) would
crash X.
witness: lock order reversal:
1st 0xfd83fef05248 uobjlk (&uobj->vmobj
Thanks!
Bulk build make us sure all packages have been built with new headers.
> On 2 Dec 2021, at 16:26, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>
> Vitaliy Makkoveev:
>
>> Include missing "sys/refcnt.h" header to unpcb.h to fix libkvm and
>> netstat(1) build. No functional changes.
>
> I ran an amd64 p
This reads correct.
OK florian
On 2021-12-02 00:01 -07, "Theo de Raadt" wrote:
> Yuichiro NAITO wrote:
>
>> bsd.upgrade fails and shows following messages with a single partition disk.
>>
>> ```
>> Force checking of clean non-root filesystems? [no] no
>> umount: /mnt: Device busy
>> Can't umou
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 10:50:32PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 24/11/21(Wed) 11:16, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > Diff below unlock the bottom part of the UVM fault handler. I'm
> > interested in squashing the remaining bugs. Please test with your usual
> > setup & report back.
>
> Thanks to
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 10:50:32PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 24/11/21(Wed) 11:16, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > Diff below unlock the bottom part of the UVM fault handler. I'm
> > interested in squashing the remaining bugs. Please test with your usual
> > setup & report back.
>
> Thanks to
Vitaliy Makkoveev:
> Include missing "sys/refcnt.h" header to unpcb.h to fix libkvm and
> netstat(1) build. No functional changes.
I ran an amd64 package bulk build with this, four ncpu=4 machines.
No problems.
(Other than for dpb's ssh connection multiplexing, I don't think
Unix domain sockets
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 01:35:14PM +0100, Krzysztof Kanas wrote:
> Hi. When remote side in sppp doesn't reply for to PPP IPCP IP-Address
> sppp will try to negotiate remote IP in endless loop. Instead use
> 10.64.64.1 + if_index as remote IP.
>
Okay, but why it doesn't reply? I don't use anymor
On 2021/12/01 20:58, Krzysztof Kanas wrote:
> On 2021-12-01 10:21, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 01:35:14PM +0100, Krzysztof Kanas wrote:
> > > Hi. When remote side in sppp doesn't reply for to PPP IPCP IP-Address
> > > sppp will try to negotiate remote IP in endless loop. Inste
On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 01:24:36AM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> ipsec_common_input_cb() extracts the inner IP header of IPsec
> tunnels. It is never used, so this is useless code.
OK kn
10 matches
Mail list logo