On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:05 -0700, Bob Beck b...@ualberta.ca wrote:
On 12 March 2010 12:53, Brad Tilley b...@16systems.com wrote:
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:10 -0800, patrick keshishian
pkesh...@gmail.com wrote:
does disabling this option /really/ improve security?
No, not unless you consider
I downloaded a snapshot i386 bsd.rd this morning to update a box. Things
are OK until I try to install sets via ftp or http. I get this error:
No such file or directory.
The installer then asks for the location of sets again (looping). It's
looking for path [pub/OpenBSD/4.7/i386] by default.
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 10:52 -0700, Theo de Raadt
dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
I downloaded a snapshot i386 bsd.rd this morning to update a box. Things
are OK until I try to install sets via ftp or http. I get this error:
No such file or directory.
The installer then asks for the
to demonstrate the
difference I was seeing.
Brad
On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 07:57 -0500, Brad Tilley b...@16systems.com wrote:
Thought the discussion was over. We repost it later.
On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 09:07 +0100, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 01:59:33PM -0500, Brad Tilley wrote
I wrote a small cpp application to generate randomish passwords. It compiles
and runs OK on OpenBSD, however, it does not seem to create random strings (the
first and last chars seldom ever change, etc). The same code compiles and runs
on Linux and Windows and *does* produce randomish strings
On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 21:32 +0100, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 12:26:43PM -0800, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Sunday, February 7, 2010, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
That is still wrong for this purpose. Although random(3) is a better
random number generator than
On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 21:40 +0100, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 03:39:25PM -0500, Brad Tilley wrote:
On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 21:32 +0100, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 12:26:43PM -0800, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Sunday
On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 22:03 +0100, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 03:43:59PM -0500, Brad Tilley wrote:
That's OK, my skin is thick. Thanks for the feedback. I had some older fltk
code there initially that behaves in a similar fashion (only it has a GUI
http://www.openbsd.com/faq/faq1.html
There's an incorrect link on this page. goals should link to goals.html not
policy.html. I don't have a cvs checkout on this computer, so here's a manual
diff:
b...@semp:~/Downloads$ diff -Nup faq1.html faq1.rbt.html
--- faq1.html 2010-01-22
# cvs diff -Nup cmd.c
Index: cmd.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/fdisk/cmd.c,v
retrieving revision 1.43
diff -N -u -p cmd.c
--- cmd.c 8 Feb 2009 18:03:18 - 1.43
+++ cmd.c 23 Dec 2009 00:18:42 -
@@ -294,7 +294,7
# cvs diff -Nup editor.c
Index: editor.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/disklabel/editor.c,v
retrieving revision 1.224
diff -N -u -p editor.c
--- editor.c12 Nov 2009 16:21:03 - 1.224
+++ editor.c23 Dec 2009 00:33:28
# cvs diff -Nup mkfs.c
Index: mkfs.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/newfs/mkfs.c,v
retrieving revision 1.72
diff -N -u -p mkfs.c
--- mkfs.c 8 Aug 2008 23:49:53 - 1.72
+++ mkfs.c 23 Dec 2009 00:55:40 -
@@ -592,7
# cvs diff -Nup ping.c
Index: ping.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/ping/ping.c,v
retrieving revision 1.85
diff -N -u -p ping.c
--- ping.c 15 Dec 2009 21:09:43 - 1.85
+++ ping.c 23 Dec 2009 01:16:59 -
@@ -1085,7
# cvs diff -Nup shutdown.c
Index: shutdown.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/shutdown/shutdown.c,v
retrieving revision 1.35
diff -N -u -p shutdown.c
--- shutdown.c 27 Oct 2009 23:59:34 - 1.35
+++ shutdown.c 23 Dec 2009 01:23:31
# cvs diff -Nup file_subs.c
Index: file_subs.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/pax/file_subs.c,v
retrieving revision 1.31
diff -N -u -p file_subs.c
--- file_subs.c 27 Oct 2009 23:59:22 - 1.31
+++ file_subs.c 22 Dec 2009 00:13:27
# cvs diff -Nup cache.c
Index: cache.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/pax/cache.c,v
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -N -u -p cache.c
--- cache.c 27 Oct 2009 23:59:22 - 1.18
+++ cache.c 22 Dec 2009 00:12:13 -
@@ -267,7
# cvs diff -Nup buf_subs.c
Index: buf_subs.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/pax/buf_subs.c,v
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -N -u -p buf_subs.c
--- buf_subs.c 27 Oct 2009 23:59:22 - 1.22
+++ buf_subs.c 22 Dec 2009 00:15:18 -
# cvs diff -Nup gnu/usr.bin/perl/t/op/array.t
Index: gnu/usr.bin/perl/t/op/array.t
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/t/op/array.t,v
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -N -u -p gnu/usr.bin/perl/t/op/array.t
---
If these are annoying, I will stop sending.
# cvs diff -Nup gnu/usr.bin/perl/util.c
Index: gnu/usr.bin/perl/util.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/util.c,v
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -N -u -p gnu/usr.bin/perl/util.c
---
# cvs diff -Nup sys/arch/vax/qbus/uda.c
Index: sys/arch/vax/qbus/uda.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/arch/vax/qbus/uda.c,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -N -u -p sys/arch/vax/qbus/uda.c
--- sys/arch/vax/qbus/uda.c 12 Nov 2005 03:44:24
# cvs diff -Nup gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/ser-go32.c
Index: gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/ser-go32.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/ser-go32.c,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -N -u -p gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/ser-go32.c
---
# cvs diff -Nup packages-specs.7
Index: packages-specs.7
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man7/packages-specs.7,v
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -N -u -p packages-specs.7
--- packages-specs.715 Jul 2008 11:10:51 - 1.10
+++
# cvs diff -Nup glob.7
Index: glob.7
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man7/glob.7,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -N -u -p glob.7
--- glob.7 5 Mar 2009 15:13:30 - 1.1
+++ glob.7 15 Dec 2009 00:25:21 -
@@ -136,4
# cvs diff -Nup ieee80211_node.9
Index: ieee80211_node.9
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man9/ieee80211_node.9,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -N -u -p ieee80211_node.9
--- ieee80211_node.916 Jun 2007 13:21:44 - 1.5
+++
# cvs diff -Nup vhold.9
Index: vhold.9
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man9/vhold.9,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -N -u -p vhold.9
--- vhold.9 31 May 2007 19:20:01 - 1.5
+++ vhold.9 15 Dec 2009 01:02:06 -
@@
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 2:26 AM, Jason McIntyre j...@kerhand.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 09:49:43PM -0500, Brad Tilley wrote:
Index: gif.4
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man4/gif.4,v
retrieving revision 1.24
diff -N
Not sure this is an acceptable patch. Certainly not required, but
maybe good practice?
# cvs diff -Nup finger.c
Index: finger.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/finger/finger.c,v
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -N -u -p finger.c
---
# cvs diff -Nup icmp6.4
Index: icmp6.4
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man4/icmp6.4,v
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -N -u -p icmp6.4
--- icmp6.4 31 May 2007 19:19:50 - 1.22
+++ icmp6.4 8 Dec 2009 02:06:24 -
@@
# cvs diff -uNp faq4.html
Index: faq4.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/www/faq/faq4.html,v
retrieving revision 1.290
diff -N -u -p faq4.html
--- faq4.html 30 Nov 2009 03:03:02 - 1.290
+++ faq4.html 6 Dec 2009 00:55:39 -
@@
Index: pflow.4
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man4/pflow.4,v
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -N -u -p pflow.4
--- pflow.4 29 Oct 2008 14:49:39 - 1.9
+++ pflow.4 27 Nov 2009 01:59:56 -
@@ -7,12 +7,12 @@
.\ purpose
Index: pfsync.4
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man4/pfsync.4,v
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -N -u -p pfsync.4
--- pfsync.417 Jun 2009 08:56:43 - 1.29
+++ pfsync.427 Nov 2009 02:09:56 -
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ Where
Anyone working on the Asus USB-N13 802.11 adapter? I have one and
would be glad to test. It's listed as a ugen device right now (on an
almost current box). I thought the run0 driver might support it. I
think it has the Ralink 3070 chipset:
dmesg:
ugen0 at uhub0 port 1 Ralink 802.11 n WLAN rev
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
This should be supported as of 2009/11/17, try a snapshot.
Yes, the usbdevs output you included was useful - but in future
please send a complete dmesg rather than an exert.
Thanks. I did a bsd.rd install from the
33 matches
Mail list logo
