Hi op.
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 20:14:37 +0200
Omar Polo wrote:
> On 2023/08/25 09:07:35 -0600, "Theo de Raadt" wrote:
> > Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> >
> > > The motivation is that several network protocols are line oriented
> > > with CRLF as line terminators. SMTP and HTTP are among the most
> > >
On 2023/08/25 09:07:35 -0600, "Theo de Raadt" wrote:
> Pietro Cerutti wrote:
>
> > The motivation is that several network protocols are line oriented
> > with CRLF as line terminators. SMTP and HTTP are among the most
> > popular.
>
> Yet, all servers of those protocols and and will accept the
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> > The motivation is that several network protocols are line oriented
> > with CRLF as line terminators. SMTP and HTTP are among the most
> > popular.
> Yet, all servers of those protocols and and will accept the simpler 1-byte
Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> The motivation is that several network protocols are line oriented
> with CRLF as line terminators. SMTP and HTTP are among the most
> popular.
Yet, all servers of those protocols and and will accept the simpler 1-byte
line terminator.
> FWIW, it works on RHEL 7.9
That
On Aug 24 2023, 01:02 UTC, Damien Miller wrote:
On Wed, 23 Aug 2023, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
Hi,
here at FreeBSD, we vendor in your netcat with a few local modifications.
I'm working on adding support to --crlf. I have a diff against the FreeBSD
version here:
On Wed, 23 Aug 2023, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here at FreeBSD, we vendor in your netcat with a few local modifications.
>
> I'm working on adding support to --crlf. I have a diff against the FreeBSD
> version here: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D41489
>
> I'd like this to be upstreamed.
Hi,
here at FreeBSD, we vendor in your netcat with a few local
modifications.
I'm working on adding support to --crlf. I have a diff against the
FreeBSD version here: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D41489
I'd like this to be upstreamed. If there's consensus, I'll prepare a
patch against
