On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 03:19:08PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>
> Remi Locherer writes:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 12:25:35AM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I've got a verbal report that Hyper-V guest services aren't attached
> >> on modern Windows 10 systems so
On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 03:19:08PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>
> Remi Locherer writes:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 12:25:35AM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I've got a verbal report that Hyper-V guest services aren't attached
> >> on modern Windows 10 systems so
Remi Locherer writes:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 12:25:35AM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've got a verbal report that Hyper-V guest services aren't attached
>> on modern Windows 10 systems so I believe we should get this one-liner
>> in before 6.6.
>>
>> FreeBSD revision 3
On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 12:25:35AM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I've got a verbal report that Hyper-V guest services aren't attached
> on modern Windows 10 systems so I believe we should get this one-liner
> in before 6.6.
>
> FreeBSD revision 349856 adds another define for VMBus
Hi Mike,
On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 12:25:35AM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I've got a verbal report that Hyper-V guest services aren't attached
> on modern Windows 10 systems so I believe we should get this one-liner
> in before 6.6.
>
> FreeBSD revision 349856 adds another define
On 04.10.2019 15:54, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> Thanks a lot for dmesgs. Do I understand correctly that paravirtualized
> disk and network work fine for you regardless of whether OpenBSD-current,
> attached one-liner diff or the linked larger diff are used?
>
> With best regards,
> Mike
I'm not sur
Andre Stoebe writes:
> On 03.10.2019 02:13, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>> And what about OpenBSD-current or an attached patch as opposed
>> to the linked one?
>>
>> Please don't go half the way if you're willing to help us out,
>> we'd like to make OpenBSD 6.6-release work in these setups
>> especia
On 03.10.2019 02:13, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> And what about OpenBSD-current or an attached patch as opposed
> to the linked one?
>
> Please don't go half the way if you're willing to help us out,
> we'd like to make OpenBSD 6.6-release work in these setups
> especially since we believe that all it
Andre Stoebe writes:
> On 01.10.2019 00:25, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've got a verbal report that Hyper-V guest services aren't attached
>> on modern Windows 10 systems so I believe we should get this one-liner
>> in before 6.6.
>>
>> FreeBSD revision 349856 adds another def
On 01.10.2019 00:25, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I've got a verbal report that Hyper-V guest services aren't attached
> on modern Windows 10 systems so I believe we should get this one-liner
> in before 6.6.
>
> FreeBSD revision 349856 adds another define for VMBus 5.0 but AFAICT
> it d
> From: Mike Belopuhov
> Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 00:25:35 +0200
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> Hi,
>
> I've got a verbal report that Hyper-V guest services aren't attached
> on modern Windows 10 systems so I believe we should get this one-liner
> in before 6.6.
>
> FreeBSD revision 349856 adds a
Hi,
I've got a verbal report that Hyper-V guest services aren't attached
on modern Windows 10 systems so I believe we should get this one-liner
in before 6.6.
FreeBSD revision 349856 adds another define for VMBus 5.0 but AFAICT
it doesn't attempt to use it in version negotiations.
Unfortunate
12 matches
Mail list logo
