On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 09:07:39AM -0700, Jonathon Fletcher wrote:
>
> Assuming no issues with this, I would like to get it into the tree. This
> patch predates Marcus' usbd_abort_pipe patch by a few weeks. Let me know
> if you want an updated patch against HEAD after his patch.
>
> After reports
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 06:56:48PM +, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 07:58:23AM -0700, Jonathon Fletcher wrote:
> >
> > Mikolaj,
> >
> > I hope the patch has been stable for you. I do have an update - it appears
> > that a splx(s) got lost along the way (from the end of ur
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 07:58:23AM -0700, Jonathon Fletcher wrote:
>
> Mikolaj,
>
> I hope the patch has been stable for you. I do have an update - it appears
> that a splx(s) got lost along the way (from the end of ure_txeof). This
> patch adds that back in and has some minor cleanup (variable n
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 07:13:33PM +, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:58:02AM -0700, Jonathon Fletcher wrote:
> >
> > Are you ok using patch's -l option for this patch?
> >
>
> Sure, can do. New kernel compiled, will switch my machine tonight. Will
> let you know how th
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 07:13:33PM +, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:58:02AM -0700, Jonathon Fletcher wrote:
> >
> > Are you ok using patch's -l option for this patch?
>
> Sure, can do. New kernel compiled, will switch my machine tonight. Will
> let you know how things
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:58:02AM -0700, Jonathon Fletcher wrote:
>
> Are you ok using patch's -l option for this patch?
>
Sure, can do. New kernel compiled, will switch my machine tonight. Will
let you know how things go. For meetings I would need couple of days, as
I don't have Google Meet ca
> On Jul 27, 2020, at 11:47 AM, Mikolaj Kucharski
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:24:55AM -0700, Jonathon Fletcher wrote:
>>
>> I have attached an updated patch - which includes Kevin's changes from
>> his earlier email - that also corrects the tx buffer sizes for RTL8153
>> / RTL8153
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:24:55AM -0700, Jonathon Fletcher wrote:
>
> I have attached an updated patch - which includes Kevin's changes from
> his earlier email - that also corrects the tx buffer sizes for RTL8153
> / RTL8153B devices.
>
Unfortunately below diff fails to apply.
2 out of 2 hunk
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 10:12 PM Mikolaj Kucharski
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 06:47:32PM -0700, Jonathon Fletcher wrote:
> > Mikolaj,
> >
> > Thank you for testing my patch.
> >
> > I am very interested to know what xhci (or ehci) hardware you have.
> >
> > I have the following:
> >
> > xh
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 06:47:32PM -0700, Jonathon Fletcher wrote:
> Mikolaj,
>
> Thank you for testing my patch.
>
> I am very interested to know what xhci (or ehci) hardware you have.
>
> I have the following:
>
> xhci0 at pci0 dev 20 function 0 "Intel 9 Series xHCI" rev 0x03: msi, xHCI 1.0
>
> On Jul 26, 2020, at 1:24 PM, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
>
> Hi Kevin, Jonathon,
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 02:38:55PM +0800, Kevin Lo wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Jonathon Fletcher has been helping get the better performance out of ure(4).
>> I ran the tcpbench with ure (RTL8156) for 5 minutes:
>>
Hi Kevin, Jonathon,
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 02:38:55PM +0800, Kevin Lo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jonathon Fletcher has been helping get the better performance out of ure(4).
> I ran the tcpbench with ure (RTL8156) for 5 minutes:
>
> 71538432760 bytes sent over 300.999 seconds
> bandwidth min/avg/max/std-
Hi,
Jonathon Fletcher has been helping get the better performance out of ure(4).
I ran the tcpbench with ure (RTL8156) for 5 minutes:
71538432760 bytes sent over 300.999 seconds
bandwidth min/avg/max/std-dev = 12.071/1901.448/1947.873/135.283 Mbps
A big thanks to Jonathon for his hard work.
ok?
13 matches
Mail list logo
