MI MTU size for lo(4)

2014-05-13 Thread Claudio Jeker
With KAME the MTU size of the loopback interface became strange and is actually dependend on the architecture. I see no point in all this just go back to the way it was long long long ago and just use 32k as the MTU. AFAIK all of this was only done to test large IPv6 packets but why MHLEN and MLEN

Re: MI MTU size for lo(4)

2014-05-13 Thread Mike Belopuhov
On 13 May 2014 15:45, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com wrote: With KAME the MTU size of the loopback interface became strange and is actually dependend on the architecture. I see no point in all this just go back to the way it was long long long ago and just use 32k as the MTU. AFAIK all

Re: MI MTU size for lo(4)

2014-05-13 Thread Mike Belopuhov
On 13 May 2014 16:05, Mike Belopuhov m...@belopuhov.com wrote: On 13 May 2014 15:45, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com wrote: With KAME the MTU size of the loopback interface became strange and is actually dependend on the architecture. I see no point in all this just go back to the way