Claudio Jeker(cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com) on 2021.01.12 10:07:57 +0100:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 01:02:50PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > The code in ospf6d is a bit broken when it comes to point-to-point links.
> > This diff fixes this by a) using the neighbor address instead of the unset
> >
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 01:02:50PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> The code in ospf6d is a bit broken when it comes to point-to-point links.
> This diff fixes this by a) using the neighbor address instead of the unset
> interface destination address and by b) matching the incomming packet
> against
On 06/01/2021 14:02, Claudio Jeker wrote:
The code in ospf6d is a bit broken when it comes to point-to-point links.
This diff fixes this by a) using the neighbor address instead of the unset
interface destination address and by b) matching the incomming packet
against all possible IPs of that
The code in ospf6d is a bit broken when it comes to point-to-point links.
This diff fixes this by a) using the neighbor address instead of the unset
interface destination address and by b) matching the incomming packet
against all possible IPs of that interface.
I tripped on b) because my P2P
