My impression on going over the netbsd commits where this came
from is that this was intended to be used with pci_set_powerstate and
friends. So I think the definitions should go, the bge changes go in,
but the ifdef'd out chunks with cardbus_setpowerstate should be deleted
entirely rather than
Hello.
Any feedback on this one?
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 02:02, Alexey Suslikov alexey.susli...@gmail.com
wrote:
hello tech@
aren't these PCI_PWR_D[0-3] defines just duplicates of
PCI_PMCSR_STATE_D[0-3] from pcireg.h?
--- /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h.orig Sat Feb 4 01:28:05 2012
+++
hello tech@
aren't these PCI_PWR_D[0-3] defines just duplicates of
PCI_PMCSR_STATE_D[0-3] from pcireg.h?
--- /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h.orig Sat Feb 4 01:28:05 2012
+++ /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h Sat Feb 4 01:28:41 2012
@@ -53,14 +53,6 @@
*/
typedef u_int32_t pcireg_t;
