On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:03:43AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2016/06/23 00:25, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > Turns out I forgot about the pthread stubs, without which there
> > > are build failures in mandoc and various ports things unless we link
> > > them with
On 2016/06/23 00:25, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > Turns out I forgot about the pthread stubs, without which there
> > are build failures in mandoc and various ports things unless we link
> > them with -lpthread. This broke a few things in my first ports test
> > build, but
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Turns out I forgot about the pthread stubs, without which there
> are build failures in mandoc and various ports things unless we link
> them with -lpthread. This broke a few things in my first ports test
> build, but thanks to guenther's work it should now be valid to
On 2016/06/22 00:10, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2016/06/08 19:01, James Turner wrote:
> > I prefer option 2. Switch to the amalgamation with our changes on top.
>
> I've been looking at this. I don't really like any of the options
> but this seems the "least worst" one. I'm not terribly happy
On 2016/06/08 19:01, James Turner wrote:
> I prefer option 2. Switch to the amalgamation with our changes on top.
I've been looking at this. I don't really like any of the options
but this seems the "least worst" one. I'm not terribly happy about
this, but I don't see what else we can really do
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 11:33:42PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2016/06/03 20:17, James Turner wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 11:24:15PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > On 2016/06/01 11:22, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > > On 2016/06/01 09:09, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > > > > And most
On 2016/06/03 20:17, James Turner wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 11:24:15PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2016/06/01 11:22, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > On 2016/06/01 09:09, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > > > And most importantly, 47 (released next week) requires 3.11.
> > > >
On 2016/06/03 20:17, James Turner wrote:
> I personally think this is the way to go. Sadly I don't have the time to
> do this right now (We just welcomed our second child recently).
Heh. One doesn't really prepare you for two :-)
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 11:24:15PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2016/06/01 11:22, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2016/06/01 09:09, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > > And most importantly, 47 (released next week) requires 3.11.
> > >
On 2016/06/01 11:22, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2016/06/01 09:09, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > And most importantly, 47 (released next week) requires 3.11.
> > /usr/obj/ports/firefox-47.0beta9/firefox-47.0b9/old-configure:SQLITE_VERSION=3.11.0
>
> Ok, I'll update the diff this evening.
So this was
> Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 07:44:23 +0200
> From: Landry Breuil
>
> > (I don't really understand how things are working in Firefox on
> > other OS, there are two different versions of sqlite in their
> > tree...even in the one firefox tarball)..
>
> Nss is considered a
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 11:08:36AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2016/06/01 07:44, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:36:35PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > Thanks for the pointer Ingo..
> > >
> > > I'll be doing tests (including a bulk ports build) with this,
> > >
On 2016/06/01 09:09, Landry Breuil wrote:
> And most importantly, 47 (released next week) requires 3.11.
> /usr/obj/ports/firefox-47.0beta9/firefox-47.0b9/old-configure:SQLITE_VERSION=3.11.0
Ok, I'll update the diff this evening.
On 2016/06/01 07:44, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:36:35PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > Thanks for the pointer Ingo..
> >
> > I'll be doing tests (including a bulk ports build) with this,
> > but here's an update to sqlite 3.10.2 (the version which is
> > in Firefox 46)
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 07:44:23AM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:36:35PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > Thanks for the pointer Ingo..
> >
> > I'll be doing tests (including a bulk ports build) with this,
> > but here's an update to sqlite 3.10.2 (the version which
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:36:35PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Thanks for the pointer Ingo..
>
> I'll be doing tests (including a bulk ports build) with this,
> but here's an update to sqlite 3.10.2 (the version which is
> in Firefox 46) in the hope it will let us get rid of the
>
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:36:35PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Thanks for the pointer Ingo..
>
> I'll be doing tests (including a bulk ports build) with this,
> but here's an update to sqlite 3.10.2 (the version which is
> in Firefox 46) in the hope it will let us get rid of the
>
17 matches
Mail list logo