Re: sqlite3 update

2016-06-23 Thread James Turner
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:03:43AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2016/06/23 00:25, Ted Unangst wrote: > > Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > Turns out I forgot about the pthread stubs, without which there > > > are build failures in mandoc and various ports things unless we link > > > them with

Re: sqlite3 update

2016-06-23 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2016/06/23 00:25, Ted Unangst wrote: > Stuart Henderson wrote: > > Turns out I forgot about the pthread stubs, without which there > > are build failures in mandoc and various ports things unless we link > > them with -lpthread. This broke a few things in my first ports test > > build, but

Re: sqlite3 update

2016-06-22 Thread Ted Unangst
Stuart Henderson wrote: > Turns out I forgot about the pthread stubs, without which there > are build failures in mandoc and various ports things unless we link > them with -lpthread. This broke a few things in my first ports test > build, but thanks to guenther's work it should now be valid to

Re: sqlite3 update

2016-06-22 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2016/06/22 00:10, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2016/06/08 19:01, James Turner wrote: > > I prefer option 2. Switch to the amalgamation with our changes on top. > > I've been looking at this. I don't really like any of the options > but this seems the "least worst" one. I'm not terribly happy

Re: sqlite3 update

2016-06-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2016/06/08 19:01, James Turner wrote: > I prefer option 2. Switch to the amalgamation with our changes on top. I've been looking at this. I don't really like any of the options but this seems the "least worst" one. I'm not terribly happy about this, but I don't see what else we can really do

Re: sqlite3 update

2016-06-08 Thread James Turner
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 11:33:42PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2016/06/03 20:17, James Turner wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 11:24:15PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > On 2016/06/01 11:22, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > > On 2016/06/01 09:09, Landry Breuil wrote: > > > > > And most

Re: sqlite3 update

2016-06-08 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2016/06/03 20:17, James Turner wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 11:24:15PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2016/06/01 11:22, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > On 2016/06/01 09:09, Landry Breuil wrote: > > > > And most importantly, 47 (released next week) requires 3.11. > > > >

Re: sqlite3 update

2016-06-03 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2016/06/03 20:17, James Turner wrote: > I personally think this is the way to go. Sadly I don't have the time to > do this right now (We just welcomed our second child recently). Heh. One doesn't really prepare you for two :-)

Re: sqlite3 update

2016-06-03 Thread James Turner
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 11:24:15PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2016/06/01 11:22, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2016/06/01 09:09, Landry Breuil wrote: > > > And most importantly, 47 (released next week) requires 3.11. > > >

Re: sqlite3 update

2016-06-03 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2016/06/01 11:22, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2016/06/01 09:09, Landry Breuil wrote: > > And most importantly, 47 (released next week) requires 3.11. > > /usr/obj/ports/firefox-47.0beta9/firefox-47.0b9/old-configure:SQLITE_VERSION=3.11.0 > > Ok, I'll update the diff this evening. So this was

Re: sqlite3 update

2016-06-01 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 07:44:23 +0200 > From: Landry Breuil > > > (I don't really understand how things are working in Firefox on > > other OS, there are two different versions of sqlite in their > > tree...even in the one firefox tarball).. > > Nss is considered a

Re: sqlite3 update

2016-06-01 Thread Landry Breuil
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 11:08:36AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2016/06/01 07:44, Landry Breuil wrote: > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:36:35PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > Thanks for the pointer Ingo.. > > > > > > I'll be doing tests (including a bulk ports build) with this, > > >

Re: sqlite3 update

2016-06-01 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2016/06/01 09:09, Landry Breuil wrote: > And most importantly, 47 (released next week) requires 3.11. > /usr/obj/ports/firefox-47.0beta9/firefox-47.0b9/old-configure:SQLITE_VERSION=3.11.0 Ok, I'll update the diff this evening.

Re: sqlite3 update

2016-06-01 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2016/06/01 07:44, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:36:35PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > Thanks for the pointer Ingo.. > > > > I'll be doing tests (including a bulk ports build) with this, > > but here's an update to sqlite 3.10.2 (the version which is > > in Firefox 46)

Re: sqlite3 update

2016-06-01 Thread Landry Breuil
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 07:44:23AM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:36:35PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > Thanks for the pointer Ingo.. > > > > I'll be doing tests (including a bulk ports build) with this, > > but here's an update to sqlite 3.10.2 (the version which

Re: sqlite3 update

2016-05-31 Thread Landry Breuil
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:36:35PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > Thanks for the pointer Ingo.. > > I'll be doing tests (including a bulk ports build) with this, > but here's an update to sqlite 3.10.2 (the version which is > in Firefox 46) in the hope it will let us get rid of the >

Re: sqlite3 update

2016-05-31 Thread James Turner
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:36:35PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > Thanks for the pointer Ingo.. > > I'll be doing tests (including a bulk ports build) with this, > but here's an update to sqlite 3.10.2 (the version which is > in Firefox 46) in the hope it will let us get rid of the >