Re: Status of Virtual Function driver for Intel 82599 series port?

2023-06-19 Thread Yuichiro NAITO
Hi. I fixed a bug on Intel 82599. Please refer to following patch. And I found that Linux 82599 PF driver doesn't allow setting VF MTU size bigger than PF MTU size. If you set bigger MTU size for ixv interface than PF MTU size, you will see the following message in dmesg and the ixv interface stop

Re: Status of Virtual Function driver for Intel 82599 series port?

2023-05-26 Thread Yuichiro NAITO
My previous patch is partly rejected for OpenBSD current. Because ixv(4) code depends on ix(4) that has changed to supported TSO/LRO. I rebased my patch for OpenBSD current. See the patch at the end of this e-mail. Thank you, Paul B. Henson! He tested my patch on Linux Qemu and now we have the kno

Re: Status of Virtual Function driver for Intel 82599 series port?

2023-05-16 Thread Theo de Raadt
Yuichiro NAITO wrote: > 2. MTU 9000 is required for 10Gbps performance. > > The default MTU size 1500 is too small for 10Gbps link for now. It is dangerous to give this suggestion without caveats. MTU over 1500 does not work on even small parts of the internet, and many people will have

Re: Status of Virtual Function driver for Intel 82599 series port?

2023-05-15 Thread Yuichiro NAITO
Hi. Paul notified me that my previous patch was broken. I changed my mailer to Mew on Emacs that sends a plain text mail without any modification. I re-send my patch by Mew. Please try following patch. Thank you! diff --git a/sys/arch/amd64/conf/GENERIC b/sys/arch/amd64/conf/GENERIC index c8e4ec

Re: Status of Virtual Function driver for Intel 82599 series port?

2023-05-11 Thread Paul B. Henson
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 11:12:56AM +0900, Yuichiro NAITO wrote: > Hi, I believe my patch works on ESXi and Linux qemu. I'm looking for a > reviewer. It's welcome to testing and reporting the results if it works > or fails to work. Cool, thanks much. I'll give it a try and report back; hopefully a

Re: Status of Virtual Function driver for Intel 82599 series port?

2023-05-10 Thread Yuichiro NAITO
On 4/30/23 04:04, Paul B. Henson wrote: > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=167160269008839&w=2 > > The port doesn't appear to be merged yet, and there's no activity on the > thread since December, so I was just wondering what the current status > of this is? If there's any further testing neede

Status of Virtual Function driver for Intel 82599 series port?

2023-04-29 Thread Paul B. Henson
I recently migrated an OpenBSD vm running under qemu/kvm to a new server which has an Intel 10G X550T NIC (Intel Corporation Ethernet Converged Network Adapter X550-T2) and am passing a vf though to the vm. I found out this this vf is not currently supported by OpenBSD, and upon inquiring on the mi