UPDATE: usr.bin/less

2011-08-30 Thread Alexandr Shadchin
Hi, http://koba.devio.us/distfiles/less.diff This update less to the latest release 444. Tested on i386 and amd64. Change build system ( or leave old ? ): * no configure, used prepared define.h * no Makefile.bsd-wrapper, used less/Makefile and lesskey/Makefile Please test on other arch. Commen

Re: UPDATE: usr.bin/less

2011-08-30 Thread Brynet
The version of less is in base is under a BSD equivalent license, the one you're updating us to is.. GPLv3. -Bryan.

Re: UPDATE: usr.bin/less

2011-08-30 Thread Brynet
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 01:45:04PM -0400, Brynet wrote: > The version of less is in base is under a BSD equivalent license, the one > you're updating us to is.. GPLv3. > > -Bryan. Ah, nevermind. It's actually under a dual BSD-alike and GPLv3 license. Hmm. -Bryan.

Re: UPDATE: usr.bin/less

2011-08-31 Thread william dunand
>> The version of less is in base is under a BSD equivalent license, the one >> you're updating us to is.. GPLv3. > Ah, nevermind. It's actually under a dual BSD-alike and GPLv3 license. Hmm. The version in base is actually dual licensed as well, (but GPLv2).

Re: UPDATE: usr.bin/less

2011-09-02 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 30/08/11(Tue) 22:37, Alexandr Shadchin wrote: > Hi, > > http://koba.devio.us/distfiles/less.diff > > This update less to the latest release 444. > Tested on i386 and amd64. > > Change build system ( or leave old ? ): > * no configure, used prepared define.h > * no Makefile.bsd-wrapper, used l

Re: UPDATE: usr.bin/less

2011-09-02 Thread Alexandr Shadchin
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 10:25:49AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > On 30/08/11(Tue) 22:37, Alexandr Shadchin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > http://koba.devio.us/distfiles/less.diff > > > > This update less to the latest release 444. > > Tested on i386 and amd64. > > > > Change build system ( or leave ol

Re: UPDATE: usr.bin/less

2011-09-02 Thread Matthieu Herrb
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 09:14:45PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 10:25:49AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > On 30/08/11(Tue) 22:37, Alexandr Shadchin wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > http://koba.devio.us/distfiles/less.diff > > > > > > This update less to the latest rele

Re: UPDATE: usr.bin/less

2011-09-03 Thread Alexandr Shadchin
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:37:15PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote: > Hi, > > http://koba.devio.us/distfiles/less.diff > > This update less to the latest release 444. > Tested on i386 and amd64. > > Change build system ( or leave old ? ): > * no configure, used prepared define.h > * no Makefile.b

Re: UPDATE: usr.bin/less

2011-09-03 Thread Alexandr Shadchin
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 05:24:52PM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 09:14:45PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 10:25:49AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > > On 30/08/11(Tue) 22:37, Alexandr Shadchin wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > http://koba.d

Re: UPDATE: usr.bin/less

2011-09-08 Thread Nicholas Marriott
I like dropping the configure goo. - What about options -m and -E which the old less added for more? - The more prompt is now --More-- which is a lot less useful than the filename (and is not POSIX I believe). On Sat, Sep 03, 2011 at 10:29:42PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote: > On Tue, Aug 3

Re: UPDATE: usr.bin/less

2011-09-08 Thread Alexandr Shadchin
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 06:31:24PM +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote: > I like dropping the configure goo. > > - What about options -m and -E which the old less added for more? > > - The more prompt is now --More-- which is a lot less useful than the > filename (and is not POSIX I believe). > Se

Re: UPDATE: usr.bin/less

2011-10-06 Thread Stuart Henderson
With the old version of less, when called as either "more" or "less", if you press either G or F ^C, you would be left at a prompt at the end of the file. In the updated version these differ; called as "less" this works fine, but as "more" it exits. Not sure if this is intentional but I'm finding

Re: UPDATE: usr.bin/less

2011-10-06 Thread Nicholas Marriott
Does this restore the old behaviour? I don't remember why -E was left out... Alexandr? Index: main.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/less/main.c,v retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -p -r1.11 main.c --- main.c 16 Sep 2011 18:12:09

Re: UPDATE: usr.bin/less

2011-10-06 Thread Stuart Henderson
Oh hmm I was slightly mistaken; G did actually exit more before, so only the behaviour of F ^C has changed. Thanks for pointing out -E, that changes behaviour of both G and F^C (which I can quite imagine some people won't want) but I am happy to set that in MORE for myself. On 2011/10/06 13:51,

Re: UPDATE: usr.bin/less

2011-10-06 Thread Nicholas Marriott
Yep they seem to have actually changed the behaviour of -E, I've been looking to see if we can restore the old behaviour but haven't got it yet. On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 02:46:27PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > Oh hmm I was slightly mistaken; G did actually exit more before, > so only the beha

Re: UPDATE: usr.bin/less

2011-10-06 Thread Alexandr Shadchin
Option -E is different for "less" and "more". for "less" - causes to automatically exit the first time it reaches end-of-file. for "more" - option -E and -e is equivalent and causes to automatically exit the second time it reaches end-of-file. Behaviour "exit the first time it reaches end-of-fil

Re: UPDATE: usr.bin/less

2011-10-08 Thread Nicholas Marriott
Thanks. ok nicm On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 11:07:50PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote: > Option -E is different for "less" and "more". > > for "less" - causes to automatically exit the first time it reaches > end-of-file. > > for "more" - option -E and -e is equivalent and causes to automatically