Theo Buehler wrote:
> ping.
>
ok
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 07:15:39PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 12:20:42PM +0100, Tobias Stoeckmann wrote:
> > > Based on Todd's patch for at and cron, I did a grep through our base
> > > tree to see if there are more occurrences of
On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 12:20:42PM +0100, Tobias Stoeckmann wrote:
> Based on Todd's patch for at and cron, I did a grep through our base
> tree to see if there are more occurrences of self-made __progname
> handling.
A few more of those:
Index: caesar/caesar.c
Tobias Stoeckmann wrote:
> Opinions, thoughts?
looks good, but you've got some mostly unrelated changes in here. this should
be separate, but ok for the rest.
> > Index: sbin/newfs_ext2fs/newfs_ext2fs.c
> > ===
> > RCS file:
On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 03:29:06AM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> looks good, but you've got some mostly unrelated changes in here. this should
> be separate, but ok for the rest.
It started with a "check argv" code review and ended up with __progname
adjustments, so I agree here and removed the
Tobias Stoeckmann wrote:
> Opinions, thoughts?
>
> > [...]
> >
> > Index: sbin/newfs/newfs.c
> > ===
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/newfs/newfs.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.100
> > diff -u -p -u -p -r1.100 newfs.c
> > ---
On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 12:20:42PM +0100, Tobias Stoeckmann wrote:
> Index: bin/mt/mt.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/mt/mt.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.36
> diff -u -p -u -p -r1.36 mt.c
> --- bin/mt/mt.c 12 Nov 2013 04:36:02
On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 03:32:11PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> As Ingo recently reminded me, OpenBSD actually did add getprogname() at
> some point, which needs need a actually manual forward definition.
Too early for writing. It does *not* need such an ugly manual extern
declaration.
