On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:17:40PM -0400, Brad wrote:
| On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 04:58:36PM -0400, Brad wrote:
| > Please test the following diff with any bge(4) adapters. Just checking to
| > ensure no regressions with known working adapters. Just check that things
| > are working as usual. Just br
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:59:46 -0400 Brad wrote:
> > Which ones should people tests?
>
> The bge(4), msk(4), ne(4) and ep(4) diffs.
>
> bge(4) and msk(4) I have and have tested those respective diffs.
> I have no ne(4) or ep(4) hardware, the changes are mechanical but
> still need testing.
I did
> On Wednesday 21 April 2010 20:18:02 Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > Which ones should people tests?
>
> The bge(4), msk(4), ne(4) and ep(4) diffs.
>
> bge(4) and msk(4) I have and have tested those respective diffs.
> I have no ne(4) or ep(4) hardware, the changes are mechanical but
> still need testi
On Wednesday 21 April 2010 20:18:02 Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Which ones should people tests?
The bge(4), msk(4), ne(4) and ep(4) diffs.
bge(4) and msk(4) I have and have tested those respective diffs.
I have no ne(4) or ep(4) hardware, the changes are mechanical but
still need testing.
> Should I
Which ones should people tests?
Should I assume _all of them_ ... since you probably tested zero yourself?
Can you please report the ones you yourself tested on, before asking others
to invest time?
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 04:58:36PM -0400, Brad wrote:
> > Please test the following diff with a
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 04:58:36PM -0400, Brad wrote:
> Please test the following diff with any bge(4) adapters. Just checking to
> ensure no regressions with known working adapters. Just check that things
> are working as usual. Just bringing in some fixes for some of the newer
> chipsets soon to
Please test the following diff with any bge(4) adapters. Just checking to
ensure no regressions with known working adapters. Just check that things
are working as usual. Just bringing in some fixes for some of the newer
chipsets soon to appear. Nothing changed with existing chipsets though.
Index
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:50:58 -0400
Brad wrote:
> Please test the following diff with any bge(4) adapters..
>
> Just check that things run as usual.
>
> Please provide me with a dmesg.
>
>
> Have bge_start check if there are less than 16 free send BDs and if not
> set IFF_OACTIVE and try again
Please test the following diff with any bge(4) adapters..
Just check that things run as usual.
Please provide me with a dmesg.
Have bge_start check if there are less than 16 free send BDs and if not
set IFF_OACTIVE and try again later. Previously bge(4) reserved 16 send
BDs after loading DMA ma