On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 03:40:07PM +0200, Björn Ketelaars wrote:
> New diff, which addresses all your comments except the "no mtu" bit in
> the parser as I do not understand what you mean.
Never mind then :)
I was thinking about something like this:
8<
mtu 1480
interface ix0 # gets mtu
On Fri 20/07/2018 07:57, Florian Obser wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 09:47:06PM +0200, Björn Ketelaars wrote:
> > On Wed 18/07/2018 08:54, Florian Obser wrote:
> > > During g2k18 I commited rad(8).
> > >
> > > The latest amd64 and i386 snapshots should contain it with enough
> > > features to
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 09:47:06PM +0200, Björn Ketelaars wrote:
> On Wed 18/07/2018 08:54, Florian Obser wrote:
> > During g2k18 I commited rad(8).
> >
> > The latest amd64 and i386 snapshots should contain it with enough
> > features to replace rtadvd(8). If you are using rtadvd(8) I'd
> >
On Wed 18/07/2018 08:54, Florian Obser wrote:
> During g2k18 I commited rad(8).
>
> The latest amd64 and i386 snapshots should contain it with enough
> features to replace rtadvd(8). If you are using rtadvd(8) I'd
> appreciate if you could switch to rad(8) and report back if any
> features are
On 7/18/2018 2:54 AM, Florian Obser wrote:
> During g2k18 I commited rad(8).
>
> [snip]
I had a chance to do a couple simple tests with rad(8) in my test
environment.
# cat rad.conf
interface em0 {
prefix fdcf:b715:2f4d:100::/64
prefix 2001:DB8:2f4d:100::/64
dns {
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 08:54:51AM +0200, Florian Obser wrote:
| During g2k18 I commited rad(8).
|
| The latest amd64 and i386 snapshots should contain it with enough
| features to replace rtadvd(8). If you are using rtadvd(8) I'd
| appreciate if you could switch to rad(8) and report back if any
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 11:03:46AM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 08:54:51AM +0200, Florian Obser wrote:
> > During g2k18 I commited rad(8).
> >
> > The latest amd64 and i386 snapshots should contain it with enough
> > features to replace rtadvd(8). If you are using
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 08:54:51AM +0200, Florian Obser wrote:
> During g2k18 I commited rad(8).
>
> The latest amd64 and i386 snapshots should contain it with enough
> features to replace rtadvd(8). If you are using rtadvd(8) I'd
> appreciate if you could switch to rad(8) and report back if any
During g2k18 I commited rad(8).
The latest amd64 and i386 snapshots should contain it with enough
features to replace rtadvd(8). If you are using rtadvd(8) I'd
appreciate if you could switch to rad(8) and report back if any
features are missing.
The plan is to unhook rtadvd(8) from the build
