On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 10:42:42AM +0100, Joerg Goltermann wrote:
> I think I found the problem inside pf_ioctl.c, it looks like
> the problem was introduced with a "mechanical" patch which
> replaced all "breaks;" with "PF_UNLOCK(); break;" This seems
> to be wrong in this particular case:
I agree
Hello Joerg,
your patch looks OK. thank you for testing & fixing.
thanks and
regard
sashan
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 10:42:42AM +0100, Joerg Goltermann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tested a kernel with WITH_PF_LOCK and NET_TASKQ > 1 and got a
> kernel panic during switching between the pf statics inside
Hello,
I tested a kernel with WITH_PF_LOCK and NET_TASKQ > 1 and got a
kernel panic during switching between the pf statics inside systat.
I think I found the problem inside pf_ioctl.c, it looks like
the problem was introduced with a "mechanical" patch which
replaced all "breaks;" with "PF_UNLO
