--- Original Message ---
On Tuesday, September 19th, 2023 at 7:03 PM, Theo de Raadt
wrote:
>
>
> Ingo, that's a bit cynical.
>
>
> As long as the process is slow, step by step, adding one or two manuals at
> a time, and focusing on being ACCURATE, then it will be good.
>
> It
Ingo, that's a bit cynical.
As long as the process is slow, step by step, adding one or two manuals at
a time, and focusing on being ACCURATE, then it will be good.
It would be wrong to add inaccurate pages. A lack of documentation is slightly
better than inaccurate documentation.
So if you
Hi Christoff,
of course you are free to work on whatever interests you, but if you are
looking for advice, i'd respectfully recommend that you try to work on
specifics rather than on generalities first, in particular when you
feel as if your experience in contributing isn't above average.
That
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 12:21:48PM +, Christoff Humphries wrote:
> Greetings all.
>
> I went searching for documentation about the kernel internals and was
> used to the intro(9) man page from NetBSD
> https://man.netbsd.org/intro.9 that had a lot more details. Would it
> be a worthwhile
Greetings all.
I went searching for documentation about the kernel internals and was
used to the intro(9) man page from NetBSD
https://man.netbsd.org/intro.9 that had a lot more details. Would it
be a worthwhile project to attempt to do the same for OpenBSD?
I understand the annoyance of folks
