At the sake of running out of internet here's a little clarification ...
... this ...
-> input channela
channela output ->
-> input channelb
channelb output ->
-> input channelc
channelc output ->
-> input channeld
channeld output ->
-> input groupA (a&b)
groupA (a&b) output ->
-> input groupB (c
Hi.
Sviatoslav Chagaev <0x1392 () gmail ! com>
> I have absolutely no idea. I'm not an audio equipment manufacturer.
I have used many consoles ... digital and analogue ones ... "live" and
in studios.
I also have an electronics background - digital and analogue ... and
repaired many consoles.
I've
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 07:02:21PM +0300, Sviatoslav Chagaev wrote:
> I always thought that the idea behind the *ctl programs is to provide a
> way to configure totally different things in a similar manner.
> Therefore *ctl programs should behave as similarily as possible.
so where is your diff t
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 07:29:01PM +0300, Sviatoslav Chagaev wrote:
> On Mon, 9 May 2011 12:44:54 +
> Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > ok then, why do some devices have 'outputs.dac' yet others have
> > 'inputs.dac'? what is the difference to the user? which is more
> > correct? why?
> >
>
> I ha
On Mon, 9 May 2011 12:44:54 +
Jacob Meuser wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 02:56:28PM +0300, Sviatoslav Chagaev wrote:
> > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:48 AM, Jacob Meuser
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 01:32:49AM +0300, Sviatoslav Chagaev wrote:
> > >> * sorted output looks cleaner,
On Mon, 9 May 2011 14:55:36 +0200
Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 02:56:28PM +0300, Sviatoslav Chagaev wrote:
> > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:48 AM, Jacob Meuser
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 01:32:49AM +0300, Sviatoslav Chagaev wrote:
> > >> * sorted output looks clea
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 02:56:28PM +0300, Sviatoslav Chagaev wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:48 AM, Jacob Meuser
> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 01:32:49AM +0300, Sviatoslav Chagaev wrote:
> >> * sorted output looks cleaner, prettier;
> >> * it's easier to find the variable you're looking f
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 02:56:28PM +0300, Sviatoslav Chagaev wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:48 AM, Jacob Meuser
> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 01:32:49AM +0300, Sviatoslav Chagaev wrote:
> >> * sorted output looks cleaner, prettier;
> >> * it's easier to find the variable you're looking f
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
wrote:
> On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Sviatoslav Chagaev
> wrote:
> ...
> Am I missing something?
>
> $ sysctl | sort > /tmp/sysctl_sorted
> $ sysctl | cmp -s /tmp/sysctl_sorted /dev/stdin || echo "different";
> different
> $
>
At t
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:48 AM, Jacob Meuser
wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 01:32:49AM +0300, Sviatoslav Chagaev wrote:
>> * sorted output looks cleaner, prettier;
>> * it's easier to find the variable you're looking for in a sorted
>> output;
>> * hierarchical variable names yet unordered? does
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 01:32:49AM +0300, Sviatoslav Chagaev wrote:
> * sorted output looks cleaner, prettier;
> * it's easier to find the variable you're looking for in a sorted
> output;
> * hierarchical variable names yet unordered? doesn't make sense;
> * this way mixerctl's behaviour will be c
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Sviatoslav Chagaev
wrote:
> * sorted output looks cleaner, prettier;
> * it's easier to find the variable you're looking for in a sorted
> output;
> * hierarchical variable names yet unordered? doesn't make sense;
> * this way mixerctl's behaviour will be closer to
* sorted output looks cleaner, prettier;
* it's easier to find the variable you're looking for in a sorted
output;
* hierarchical variable names yet unordered? doesn't make sense;
* this way mixerctl's behaviour will be closer to other *ctl programs
which output variables in an ordered fashion (aud
13 matches
Mail list logo
