Re: pfsync(4) vs splnet()

2017-05-26 Thread Alexandr Nedvedicky
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 04:10:25PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > pfsyncioctl already runs under the NET_LOCK() and pfsync(4) doesn't > touch any hardware so these splnet() are useless. > > ok? looks good to me. OK sashan@

pfsync(4) vs splnet()

2017-05-26 Thread Martin Pieuchot
pfsyncioctl already runs under the NET_LOCK() and pfsync(4) doesn't touch any hardware so these splnet() are useless. ok? Index: net/if_pfsync.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/if_pfsync.c,v retrieving revision 1.251 diff -u -p -r1.25