On 29/10/15(Thu) 13:32, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 11:58 +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 29/10/15(Thu) 02:49, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> > > On 28 October 2015 at 18:41, Alexandr Nedvedicky
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hello Mike,
> > > >
> > > >
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 11:58 +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 29/10/15(Thu) 02:49, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> > On 28 October 2015 at 18:41, Alexandr Nedvedicky
> > wrote:
> > > Hello Mike,
> > >
> > > just a quick question:
> > >
> > > are you going to
Hello,
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 01:51:31PM +0200, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 01:41:50PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> > On 16 October 2015 at 13:28, Alexandr Nedvedicky
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > may be it's kind of bike shading...
> > > How
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 02:49:40AM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On 28 October 2015 at 18:41, Alexandr Nedvedicky
> wrote:
> > Hello Mike,
> >
> > just a quick question:
> >
> > are you going to commit your pfi_kif_find() et. al.?
> > or more work
On 29/10/15(Thu) 02:49, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On 28 October 2015 at 18:41, Alexandr Nedvedicky
> wrote:
> > Hello Mike,
> >
> > just a quick question:
> >
> > are you going to commit your pfi_kif_find() et. al.?
> > or more work is needed there?
>
Hello Mike,
just a quick question:
are you going to commit your pfi_kif_find() et. al.?
or more work is needed there?
thanks a lot
regards
sasha
>
> Turns out this is a rather simple issue that got slightly
> complicated by the code diverging quite a bit since the
> inception.
On 28 October 2015 at 18:41, Alexandr Nedvedicky
wrote:
> Hello Mike,
>
> just a quick question:
>
> are you going to commit your pfi_kif_find() et. al.?
> or more work is needed there?
>
I need OKs
> thanks a lot
> regards
> sasha
>
>>
>> Turns
On 16 October 2015 at 13:28, Alexandr Nedvedicky
wrote:
>
> may be it's kind of bike shading...
> How about make kifs to stick to convention we see for other objects
> such as rulesets/anchors:
>
> pfi_kif_find()
> pfi_kif_find_or_create()
>
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 01:41:50PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On 16 October 2015 at 13:28, Alexandr Nedvedicky
> wrote:
> >
> > may be it's kind of bike shading...
> > How about make kifs to stick to convention we see for other objects
> > such as
>
> Turns out this is a rather simple issue that got slightly
> complicated by the code diverging quite a bit since the
> inception. Essentially the clr->ifname comes from the
> interface specification in the "pfctl -i foo0 -Fs" for
> if-bound states (floating states use fake interface "any").
>
> On 12 Oct 2015, at 12:00 AM, Alexandr Nedvedicky
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> patch below introduces struct refcnt to pfi_kif structure. Patch also changes
> pfi_kif_get() function to always return a reference to pfi_kif instance.
>
> Furthermore existing
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 20:36 +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
>
> > On 12 Oct 2015, at 12:00 AM, Alexandr Nedvedicky
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > patch below introduces struct refcnt to pfi_kif structure. Patch also
> > changes
> > pfi_kif_get() function to
Hello,
> > > Furthermore existing functions pfi_kif_ref()/pfi_kif_unref() are thrown
> > > away
> > > in favor of pfi_kif_take()/pfi_kif_rele(), which follow naming convention
> > > set by refcnt_init(9). Patch also removes kif reference types (enum
> > > pfi_kif_refs).
> > >
> [snip]
> > > @@
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 20:36 +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
>
> > On 12 Oct 2015, at 12:00 AM, Alexandr Nedvedicky
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > patch below introduces struct refcnt to pfi_kif structure. Patch also
> > changes
> > pfi_kif_get() function to
> On 13 Oct 2015, at 21:12, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 20:36 +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
>>
>>> On 12 Oct 2015, at 12:00 AM, Alexandr Nedvedicky
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> patch below introduces struct refcnt
15 matches
Mail list logo