On Tue, 1 Oct 2013 21:32:30 +0200 (CEST)
Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Some re(4) variants now use msi. Unfortunately the interrupt handler
> isn't careful enough, and we might miss an interrupt. The diff below
> seems to fix that by disabling the interrupts while processing an
> interrupt. This is wh
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 09:32:30PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Some re(4) variants now use msi. Unfortunately the interrupt handler
> isn't careful enough, and we might miss an interrupt. The diff below
> seems to fix that by disabling the interrupts while processing an
> interrupt. This is wh
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 09:32:30PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Some re(4) variants now use msi. Unfortunately the interrupt handler
> isn't careful enough, and we might miss an interrupt. The diff below
> seems to fix that by disabling the interrupts while processing an
> interrupt. This is wh
Some re(4) variants now use msi. Unfortunately the interrupt handler
isn't careful enough, and we might miss an interrupt. The diff below
seems to fix that by disabling the interrupts while processing an
interrupt. This is what FreeBSD & Linux seem to do.
Needs testing on a wide variety of re(4
On 2009-07-22 23:18:18, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> This diff switches re(4) over to MCLGETI, bringing goodies like lower
> memory usage and livelock mitigation. Getting this right usually
> takes some effort. So please help me with getting this tested if you
> have any machines with re(4).
>
> Than
(Mark wrote)
>
> This diff switches re(4) over to MCLGETI, bringing goodies like lower
> memory usage and livelock mitigation. Getting this right usually
> takes some effort. So please help me with getting this tested if you
> have any machines with re(4).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mark
>
>
(patch sni
On 2009/07/23 12:35, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:18:18 +0200 (CEST)
> Mark Kettenis wrote:
>
> > This diff switches re(4) over to MCLGETI, bringing goodies like lower
> > memory usage and livelock mitigation. Getting this right usually
> > takes some effort. So please help me w
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:18:18 +0200 (CEST)
Mark Kettenis wrote:
> This diff switches re(4) over to MCLGETI, bringing goodies like lower
> memory usage and livelock mitigation. Getting this right usually
> takes some effort. So please help me with getting this tested if you
> have any machines wi
This diff switches re(4) over to MCLGETI, bringing goodies like lower
memory usage and livelock mitigation. Getting this right usually
takes some effort. So please help me with getting this tested if you
have any machines with re(4).
Thanks,
Mark
Index: re.c
==
