:45 -
@@ -2,4 +2,6 @@
PROG= rm
+LINKS= ${BINDIR}/rm ${BINDIR}/tedu
+
.include
Index: gnu/usr.bin/cvs/src/main.c
===
RCS file: /home/open/anoncvs/cvs/src/gnu/usr.bin/cvs/src/main.c,v
retrieving revision 1.39
diff -u -p -r1.39
() so tedu it.
OK?
diff --git sys/net/raw_cb.c sys/net/raw_cb.c
index 107ccc37964..f2396c704dd 100644
--- sys/net/raw_cb.c
+++ sys/net/raw_cb.c
@@ -104,13 +104,3 @@ raw_do_detach(struct rawcb *rp)
sofree(so);
free((caddr_t)(rp), M_PCB, 0);
}
-
-/*
- * Disconnect and possibly release
This inlines all the trivial functions in the various places.
OK?
diff --git sys/conf/files sys/conf/files
index 03b4a0e24cc..2771b6f4446 100644
--- sys/conf/files
+++ sys/conf/files
@@ -788,7 +788,6 @@ file net/switchctl.cswitch
file net/switchofp.c swit
Is it ok to zap .klogin?
cheers
David
Index: distrib/sets/lists/etc/mi
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/distrib/sets/lists/etc/mi,v
retrieving revision 1.162
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.162 mi
--- distrib/sets/lists/etc/mi 24 Apr 2014 21:07:37 -00
This isn't used, the idle thread just sets the PEG flag and goes on.
Index: kern/kern_sched.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/kern/kern_sched.c,v
retrieving revision 1.27
diff -d -u -p -r1.27 kern_sched.c
--- kern/kern_sched.c 10 Jul 20
n/rm/Makefile 21 Sep 1997 11:35:40 - 1.3
> +++ bin/rm/Makefile 15 Mar 2013 16:13:45 -
> @@ -2,4 +2,6 @@
>
> PROG=rm
>
> +LINKS= ${BINDIR}/rm ${BINDIR}/tedu
> +
> .include
> Index: gnu/usr.bin/cvs/src/main.c
> ==
n/rm/Makefile 21 Sep 1997 11:35:40 - 1.3
> +++ bin/rm/Makefile 15 Mar 2013 16:13:45 -
> @@ -2,4 +2,6 @@
>
> PROG=rm
>
> +LINKS= ${BINDIR}/rm ${BINDIR}/tedu
> +
I resent not having pkg_tedu then.
Do we want make tedu=tedu
in the ports tree ?
:)
On 9 August 2013 09:36, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> It's me again :) With a freshly updated and tested diff to tedu netatm.
> I got no objection since I raised the issue 5 months ago [0], so I'm now
> looking for oks.
>
> [0] http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=1363
I think I put this in for compatibility with the old tools years ago.
I don't think anyone still uses this, so this can probably die.
(I have run a grep thru the ports tree and the man pages, no reference at all)
okay ?
Index: OpenBSD/Delete.pm
===
> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 21:44:06 +0200
> From: "Christiano F. Haesbaert"
>
> This isn't used, the idle thread just sets the PEG flag and goes on.
Please don't; I have some stuff that *will* use this.
> Index: kern/kern_sched.c
>
On 10 July 2012 22:32, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 21:44:06 +0200
>> From: "Christiano F. Haesbaert"
>>
>> This isn't used, the idle thread just sets the PEG flag and goes on.
>
> Please don't; I have some stuff that *will* use this.
>
Okayz :)
>> Index: kern/kern_sched.c
>>
Hi,
as we don't even have the "get" command in base, there is no need to
support SCCS files anymore. I also remember that we removed the
SCCS IDs from source files so...
Time to tedu sccs?
Tobias
Index: common.h
=
m_act was the historical name of m_nextpkt, and was already deprecated
at the time D&I of 4.4BSD was published. Nothing in our tree uses it,
so I would like to propose removing it. Both FreeBSD and NetBSD have
removed theirs.
I have tested this with make build+release. I also partially tested
t
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 01:19:32PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
> I think I put this in for compatibility with the old tools years ago.
> I don't think anyone still uses this, so this can probably die.
>
> (I have run a grep thru the ports tree and the man pages, no reference at all)
>
> okay ?
I th
Hi,
There is no IPv6 default scope in OpenBSD. Remove leftovers.
No binary change.
ok?
bluhm
Index: netinet6/raw_ip6.c
===
RCS file: /data/mirror/openbsd/cvs/src/sys/netinet6/raw_ip6.c,v
retrieving revision 1.50
diff -u -p -r1.50
tedu@ proposed suppressing that symlink a while ago. The base system
had been fixed at that time, and a bulk build (thanks ajacoutot@) didn't
show any fallout. https://codesearch.debian.net/ doesn't report
anything that might be affected.
ok?
Index: includ
S files fairly often and would like to have a
better sccs {annotate,checkout,diff} tool, put patching based
on SCCS files is indeed pointless nowadays.
> Time to tedu sccs?
ok schwarze@
Ingo
> Index: common.h
> ===
&
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 19:25, Tobias Stoeckmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as we don't even have the "get" command in base, there is no need to
> support SCCS files anymore. I also remember that we removed the
> SCCS IDs from source files so...
>
> Time to tedu sccs
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:02:33PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Are we still tracking upstream patch in any way? I think we've
> diverged in a few places, but there still is an upstream, yes?
I don't think so. Looking at the past, the first version was written
by Larry Wall who licensed it to FSF
> On 9 Feb 2015, at 1:40 pm, Lawrence Teo wrote:
>
> m_act was the historical name of m_nextpkt, and was already deprecated
> at the time D&I of 4.4BSD was published. Nothing in our tree uses it,
> so I would like to propose removing it. Both FreeBSD and NetBSD have
> removed theirs.
>
> I ha
Hi,
As far as I can tell, there is no point in having these files lying
around in /etc as they are not needed by tcsh. They're all comments
and don't even hold an example.
Thus, remove them and make them optional in /etc/mtree/special.
Objections from tcsh users?
OK?
/Alexander
Index: Makef
tedu some unused code. it has never been enabled and will not be; to
deal with a hardware defect for rare boards. unmaintained, untested, etc.
want to get rid of it.
Comments? OK?
Index: re.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/src/sys/dev/ic
This no longer applies, it is probably a leftover from the days when we
had a global runqueue. Discussed with blambert.
ok ?
Index: sched_bsd.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/kern/sched_bsd.c,v
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -d -u -p -r1.
outs of other changes.
>
> Would anyone mourn their deportation to the Attic?
>
> In other words, ok to tedu them? Diff below.
>
> Martin
The only reason it is disabled in GENERIC is that the config
logic needs to be fixed, here i
> > > ueagle(4) is the only driver requiring netnatm and none of them are
> > > enabled in GENERIC. All commits touching this code are just fixups
> > > for fallouts of other changes.
> > >
> > > Would anyone mourn their deportation to the Attic?
> &
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 01:33:06AM +0100, Alexander Hall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As far as I can tell, there is no point in having these files lying
> around in /etc as they are not needed by tcsh. They're all comments
> and don't even hold an example.
>
> Thus, remove them and make them optional in /e
Brad Smith [b...@comstyle.com] wrote:
> tedu some unused code. it has never been enabled and will not be; to
> deal with a hardware defect for rare boards. unmaintained, untested, etc.
> want to get rid of it.
>
> Comments? OK?
>
If RE_DIAG wasn't being compiled in, th
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 09:55:54AM -0800, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> Brad Smith [b...@comstyle.com] wrote:
> > tedu some unused code. it has never been enabled and will not be; to
> > deal with a hardware defect for rare boards. unmaintained, untested, etc.
> >
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 10:47:16AM +0200, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
> This no longer applies, it is probably a leftover from the days when we
> had a global runqueue. Discussed with blambert.
>
> ok ?
>
> Index: sched_bsd.c
> ==
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 15:30, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Diffs below kill respectively faith(4) and faithd(8) as suggested some
> weeks ago after a submission by dhill.
>
> ok?
I am, of course, implicitly ok will all deletions of obsolete code.
On 12 March 2013 19:25, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 15:30, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>> Diffs below kill respectively faith(4) and faithd(8) as suggested some
>> weeks ago after a submission by dhill.
>>
>> ok?
>
> I am, of course, implicitly ok will all deletions of obsolete code.
>
2013/3/12 Martin Pieuchot
> Diffs below kill respectively faith(4) and faithd(8) as suggested some
> weeks ago after a submission by dhill.
>
>
Should this teduing include removal from :
distrib/sets/lists/base/mi
distrib/sets/lists/man/mi
..also, or does that always fall on todd/theo to sync?
-
32 matches
Mail list logo
