Hi,
I'm having some minor trouble upgrading my I4B software to use the new
bsd.kmodule.mk and associated i4b.kmod output.
1) How can I dynamically load such a module at runtime?
I tried to edit boot.cfg and add load i4b. It prints out during boot:
Loaded i4b
But the callbacks in my code (see
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:44:43 +0100
Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net wrote:
Hi,
I'm having some minor trouble upgrading my I4B software to use the new
bsd.kmodule.mk and associated i4b.kmod output.
1) How can I dynamically load such a module at runtime?
Unless this recently changed,
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:11:09 -0500
Matthew Mondor mm_li...@pulsar-zone.net wrote:
Unless this recently changed, I think that netbsd-5 modload(8)
currently only supports the dynamic loading of LKMs (old-style modules
from /usr/lkm/).
I think that I misread though, I'm not sure if the netbsd-5
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010, Matthew Mondor wrote:
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:11:09 -0500
Matthew Mondor mm_li...@pulsar-zone.net wrote:
Unless this recently changed, I think that netbsd-5 modload(8)
currently only supports the dynamic loading of LKMs (old-style modules
from /usr/lkm/).
I think that I
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 08:45:48PM +0100, Frank Wille wrote:
Therefore I would like to change ddb/db_write_cmd.c as in the following
patch:
[...]
Any objections? Do we absolutely need to print the old value here?
I think it's somewhat desirable to. Wouldn't it be better anyway to
At Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:37:41 +0900, Masao Uebayashi uebay...@tombi.co.jp
wrote:
Subject: Re: kernel level multilink PPP and maybe (re)porting FreeBSD netgraph
What you need is something like npppd/pipex which OpenBSD has just imported?
Not as it is, as far as I can tell. (I don't see any
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 03:59:29PM -0500, Greg A. Woods wrote:
The kernel code (if indeed it has any client code -- not sure yet)
doesn't seem to allow forwarding through UDP or TCP. It does mention
PPTP, and PPPoE in places but those don't really help me directly.
You can operate gre(4) over
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 08:45:48PM +0100, Frank Wille wrote:
Therefore I would like to change ddb/db_write_cmd.c as in the following
patch:
[...]
Any objections? Do we absolutely need to print the old value here?
I think it's somewhat desirable to. Wouldn't it
matthew green wrote:
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 08:45:48PM +0100, Frank Wille wrote:
Therefore I would like to change ddb/db_write_cmd.c as in the
following ch:
[...]
Any objections? Do we absolutely need to print the old value here?
I think it's somewhat desirable to. Wouldn't
Hi,
while investigating directory corruption on my NFS server I found
a possible issue with the buffer cache.
The buffer cache keeps a hash of buf_t, the key being (vp, bp-b_lblkno).
This allows, for a read or write, to find if a buffer for this block
has already been allocated and if data is
At Sat, 30 Jan 2010 15:11:03 -0600, David Young dyo...@pobox.com wrote:
Subject: Re: kernel level multilink PPP and maybe (re)porting FreeBSD netgraph
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 03:59:29PM -0500, Greg A. Woods wrote:
The kernel code (if indeed it has any client code -- not sure yet)
doesn't
another alternative would be to add a flag to write, eg write/n.
.mrg.
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 12:35:16AM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
Hi,
while investigating directory corruption on my NFS server I found
a possible issue with the buffer cache.
[...]
I think vclean() should also take care of removing the vnode from
the buffer cache's hash. Comments ?
Yes.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 09:55:53PM +, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
Unless anyone objects, I would like to change struct
uvm_object::vmobjlock to be dynamically allocated with
mutex_obj_alloc(). It allows us to: 1) share the lock among
objects by holding a reference 2) avoid
14 matches
Mail list logo
