On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 18:38:53 -0500 "Greg A. Woods" <wo...@planix.ca> wrote: >> Is MLPPD necessary/desirable for some reason? > > I'm not sure what MLPPD is -- Did you mean MLPPP? If so, then yes, > MLPPP is, currently, a core feature of the project I'm working on.
Does the project use "The PPP Multilink Protocol" described in RFC 1717? If so, as far as I know MP(RFC1717) is for combine multiple PPP links into a logical data link. What tunnelling protocol the project use? Why the tunnelling protocol need the MP? --yasuoka
