Hello,
I just noticed that dyoung's bus_space rototill left shark broken - no
bus_defs.h or bus_funcs.h
Shark does have an unsupported ( and almost always unused ) PCI slot though ;)
Either way, its own bus_space is weird as it is ( it operates only on kernel
virtual addresses which makes implem
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:03:06PM +0200, Adam Hoka wrote:
> > > > Other fses with their own rename implementations whose locking is
> > > > clearly wrong include tmpfs, msdosfs, udf, and nilfs.
> >
> > As opposed to ffs? What's your point?
>
> I think he meant that it's most likely to be u
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:49:32 +
David Holland wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 09:37:33AM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 08:00:18AM +, David Holland wrote:
> > >
> > > Other fses with their own rename implementations whose locking is
> > > clearly wrong
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:52:33AM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 02:49:32PM +, David Holland wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 09:37:33AM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 08:00:18AM +, David Holland wrote:
> > > >
> > >
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 02:49:32PM +, David Holland wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 09:37:33AM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 08:00:18AM +, David Holland wrote:
> > >
> > > Other fses with their own rename implementations whose locking is
> > > clearly w
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 09:37:33AM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 08:00:18AM +, David Holland wrote:
> >
> > Other fses with their own rename implementations whose locking is
> > clearly wrong include tmpfs, msdosfs, udf, and nilfs.
> ^
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 08:00:18AM +, David Holland wrote:
>
> Other fses with their own rename implementations whose locking is
> clearly wrong include tmpfs, msdosfs, udf, and nilfs.
^ this one seems urgent, no?
Thor
