On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:52:33AM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 02:49:32PM +0000, David Holland wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 09:37:33AM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 08:00:18AM +0000, David Holland wrote: > > > > > > > > Other fses with their own rename implementations whose locking is > > > > clearly wrong include tmpfs, msdosfs, udf, and nilfs. > > > ^^^^^ this one seems urgent, no? > > > > As opposed to ffs? What's your point? > > Nothing except that some of these issues are more severe in practice > than others. Very few people are using LFS, very many using tmpfs.
You do realize that lfs uses the same ufs_rename that ffs does? (mostly) so that fixing one fixes (mostly) the other? -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org
