On Jun 10, 9:36am, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Edgar_Fu=DF?= wrote:
}
} > Areca is one decent choice.
} Thanks. But which Areca controllers are supported by NetBSD?
} I can find lots of their PCI IDs in dev/pci/arcmsr.c, bu I fail to map
} product names (e.g. ARC-1320-8i) to PCI IDs.
I'm using:
arcmsr0
Hi,
This is the second batch. Same as before, but this time changes that
affect only netsmb and lmc. Here the original checks are done through
definitions (smb_suser() and CHECK_CAP, respectively). For lmc I
believe it's a simple change, for netsmb I repalced the original
blanket call with four di
hi,
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:48:37PM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:00:05PM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
>> >> have you considered to separate the entity being cached from vnode?
>> >
>> > What would this buy us ? the data are intimely tied to the
On 11/03/2011 02:02 AM, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
> Hello Lars,
>
> Sorry for late reply.
>
> Lars Heidieker wrote:
i uploaded a new version of the kmem-pool-vmem-uvm patch:
ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/misc/para/kmem-pool-vmem-uvm.patch
>> <...>
>>
>> I've uploaded a new
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 02:27:30PM -0500, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 04:24:27PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:03:02AM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > > It's not "breaking it on the branch", it introducing a backward compat
> > > problem with th
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 04:24:27PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:03:02AM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > It's not "breaking it on the branch", it introducing a backward compat
> > problem with the lfs modules, for those who are using the lfs
> > module (it's statically bu
On 01/10/2012 03:30 AM, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> hi,
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to change upreempt_pri to default to 0 as this makes
>> wakeups where the interrupted cpu schedules a thread on another
>> cpu behave like as if it where scheduled on the interrupted cpu.
>>
>> For the case that
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:36:35 -0500
Elad Efrat wrote:
> Attached is a diff that reduces the use of KAUTH_GENERIC_ISSUSER. I
> plan to commit it a week or so after the branch.
Thanks for working on this.
While I understand most changes, after looking at the diff I wondered:
anyone know what is sp
Hi,
The current code confuses "lock_state" for something that it isn't. I
discussed this a while ago with hannken@ and blymn@ and came up with
the attached patch. We change the semantics to require locking and add
a KASSERT to make sure they're followed. Missing locking bits are
added in two place
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:03:02AM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> It's not "breaking it on the branch", it introducing a backward compat
> problem with the lfs modules, for those who are using the lfs
> module (it's statically built into the kernel by default).
>
> I didn't feel it's a problem, but
> Areca is one decent choice.
Thanks. But which Areca controllers are supported by NetBSD?
I can find lots of their PCI IDs in dev/pci/arcmsr.c, bu I fail to map product
names (e.g. ARC-1320-8i) to PCI IDs.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:21:13AM +1100, matthew green wrote:
> > I am in agreement with Manuel. Without going into argument on BSD LFS
> > design issues, current code is way too far from being anywhere stable
> > and reliable. It should not block any progress in other subsystems.
>
> irregardl
Hello,
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:36:35 -0500
Elad Efrat wrote:
> Most of it is mechanically replacing the above action with something
> more meaningful, together with the necessary secmodel bits. To make
> reviewing easier, below there's a list of files. If you see a file you
> want to double-check
Hi,
Attached is a diff that reduces the use of KAUTH_GENERIC_ISSUSER. I
plan to commit it a week or so after the branch.
Most of it is mechanically replacing the above action with something
more meaningful, together with the necessary secmodel bits. To make
reviewing easier, below there's a list
14 matches
Mail list logo
