On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 06:40:22AM +0200, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Sure, but regardless of where that other check is implemented, it
seems like it might be wrong, since it's checking the real uid,
not the effective uid.
That would be nice to have a fix for that in 6.0. The thing
Hi,
I have asked this before, but got no replies. We are making AT91SAM9G20
based hardware and I would love to run NetBSD on it. However, I can't
find the time to port NetBSD to this MCU and hardware. Is there anyone
with some spare time and interest in this kind of a project? I could
provide
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 04:42:57PM +1000, matthew green wrote:
the right place to document this is in the source code, not in the
public documentation. please move or delete this.
The flags are documented in source code. However since we named the
field uc_flags and not _uc_flags, one could
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 06:37:27AM +, David Holland wrote:
Changing it to effective uid seems like a good plan.
The change below fixes the test case. Is it safe to commit?
Index: sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c
===
RCS file:
On Sep 5, 2012, at 12:43 AM, Jukka Marin wrote:
Hi,
I have asked this before, but got no replies. We are making AT91SAM9G20
based hardware and I would love to run NetBSD on it. However, I can't
find the time to port NetBSD to this MCU and hardware. Is there anyone
with some spare time
In article 20120905123416.gb10...@homeworld.netbsd.org,
Emmanuel Dreyfus m...@netbsd.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 06:37:27AM +, David Holland wrote:
Changing it to effective uid seems like a good plan.
The change below fixes the test case. Is it safe to commit?
Yes, but it should all
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 12:34:16PM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 06:37:27AM +, David Holland wrote:
Changing it to effective uid seems like a good plan.
The change below fixes the test case. Is it safe to commit?
It fixes the test case, but it is still wrong.
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 10:54:43AM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 12:34:16PM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 06:37:27AM +, David Holland wrote:
Changing it to effective uid seems like a good plan.
The change below fixes the test
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 12:00:47PM -0500, Eric Haszlakiewicz wrote:
Changing it to effective uid seems like a good plan.
The change below fixes the test case. Is it safe to commit?
It fixes the test case, but it is still wrong. This UID check
needs to be implemented in the
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 05:10:33PM +, David Holland wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 12:00:47PM -0500, Eric Haszlakiewicz wrote:
Changing it to effective uid seems like a good plan.
The change below fixes the test case. Is it safe to commit?
It fixes the test case, but
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 12:14:11PM -0500, Eric Haszlakiewicz wrote:
Changing it to effective uid seems like a good plan.
The change below fixes the test case. Is it safe to commit?
It fixes the test case, but it is still wrong. This UID check
needs to be
On Sep 5, 2012, at 11:50 AM, vinc...@labri.fr wrote:
Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com writes:
On Sep 5, 2012, at 12:43 AM, Jukka Marin wrote:
The main features of our current hardware are:
- AT91SAM9G20 MCU (400 MHz)
[...]
Apart from a few clocks, this should work with the AT91SAM9260
Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com writes:
On Sep 5, 2012, at 12:43 AM, Jukka Marin wrote:
The main features of our current hardware are:
- AT91SAM9G20 MCU (400 MHz)
[...]
Apart from a few clocks, this should work with the AT91SAM9260 support
that's in the tree. The device tables/trees are the
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 09:08:56AM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 04:42:57PM +1000, matthew green wrote:
the right place to document this is in the source code, not in the
public documentation. please move or delete this.
Indeed.
The flags are documented in source
hi,
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 04:45:48PM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
After a few round behind the scenes with portmasters (Hi Nick, hi Martin!),
here is the latest incarnation of swpacontext vs libpthread patch.
If there are no concerns left, I plan to commit within 2 days.
I still
15 matches
Mail list logo
