Re: WAPBL fix for deallocation exhaustion + slow file removal

2016-10-06 Thread Taylor R Campbell
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 22:36:48 +0200 From: Jaromír Doleček I've incorporated the mutex fix, here is the final patch relative to trunk. I'd like to commit this sometime next week. OK, thanks, I'll try to find time to review in the next couple days!

Re: WAPBL fix for deallocation exhaustion + slow file removal

2016-10-06 Thread Jaromír Doleček
I've incorporated the mutex fix, here is the final patch relative to trunk. I'd like to commit this sometime next week. Jaromir 2016-10-01 19:00 GMT+02:00 Taylor R Campbell : >Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2016 18:40:31 +0200 >From: Jaromír Dole ek

Re: "Wire" definitions and __packed

2016-10-06 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 06:08:30PM +, paul.kon...@dell.com wrote: > Still, though, the original comment is largely valid: you can't do > meaningful testing of changes that affect alignment on an x86 system, > because for the most part it doesn't care. (The same goes for various > other CISC

Re: "Wire" definitions and __packed

2016-10-06 Thread Paul.Koning
> On Oct 6, 2016, at 2:01 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 04:59:30AM +1100, matthew green wrote: >> John Nemeth writes: >>> On Oct 6, 3:01pm, matthew green wrote: >>> } >>> } > X86 doesn't have alignment restrictions. The platform >>> } >

Re: "Wire" definitions and __packed

2016-10-06 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 04:59:30AM +1100, matthew green wrote: > John Nemeth writes: > > On Oct 6, 3:01pm, matthew green wrote: > > } > > } > X86 doesn't have alignment restrictions. The platform > > } > practically lets you get away with murder, and thus is not useful > > } > as a test

re: "Wire" definitions and __packed

2016-10-06 Thread matthew green
John Nemeth writes: > On Oct 6, 3:01pm, matthew green wrote: > } > } > X86 doesn't have alignment restrictions. The platform > } > practically lets you get away with murder, and thus is not useful > } > as a test platform. > } > } FWIW, this hasn't been true since at least 1999 (SSE.)

re: "Wire" definitions and __packed

2016-10-06 Thread John Nemeth
On Oct 6, 3:01pm, matthew green wrote: } } > X86 doesn't have alignment restrictions. The platform } > practically lets you get away with murder, and thus is not useful } > as a test platform. } } FWIW, this hasn't been true since at least 1999 (SSE.) also, That only counts if