Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 22:36:48 +0200
From: Jaromír Doleček
I've incorporated the mutex fix, here is the final patch relative to
trunk. I'd like to commit this sometime next week.
OK, thanks, I'll try to find time to review in the next couple days!
I've incorporated the mutex fix, here is the final patch relative to
trunk. I'd like to commit this sometime next week.
Jaromir
2016-10-01 19:00 GMT+02:00 Taylor R Campbell
:
>Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2016 18:40:31 +0200
>From: Jaromír Dole ek
>
>> Thanks for taking a shot at this! But I th
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 06:08:30PM +, paul.kon...@dell.com wrote:
> Still, though, the original comment is largely valid: you can't do
> meaningful testing of changes that affect alignment on an x86 system,
> because for the most part it doesn't care. (The same goes for various
> other CISC ma
> On Oct 6, 2016, at 2:01 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 04:59:30AM +1100, matthew green wrote:
>> John Nemeth writes:
>>> On Oct 6, 3:01pm, matthew green wrote:
>>> }
>>> } > X86 doesn't have alignment restrictions. The platform
>>> } > practically lets you get
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 04:59:30AM +1100, matthew green wrote:
> John Nemeth writes:
> > On Oct 6, 3:01pm, matthew green wrote:
> > }
> > } > X86 doesn't have alignment restrictions. The platform
> > } > practically lets you get away with murder, and thus is not useful
> > } > as a test plat
John Nemeth writes:
> On Oct 6, 3:01pm, matthew green wrote:
> }
> } > X86 doesn't have alignment restrictions. The platform
> } > practically lets you get away with murder, and thus is not useful
> } > as a test platform.
> }
> } FWIW, this hasn't been true since at least 1999 (SSE.) also