In article
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 at 10:39 PM, Siddharth Muralee <
siddharth.mura...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey,
>I am a second-year undergraduate student at Amrita University,
> Amritapuri, India. I would like to take up one of the ideas suggested in
> your wiki namely, "Kernel Address SANitizer". I am a
On 15.03.2018 17:53, Siddharth Muralee wrote:
> Hey,
Welcome!
> I am a second-year undergraduate student at Amrita University,
> Amritapuri, India. I would like to take up one of the ideas suggested in
> your wiki namely, "Kernel Address SANitizer". I am a security enthusiast
> and I am
Hey,
I am a second-year undergraduate student at Amrita University,
Amritapuri, India. I would like to take up one of the ideas suggested in
your wiki namely, "Kernel Address SANitizer". I am a security enthusiast
and I am familiar with both user-land and kernel-level exploitation. I have
On Mar 15, 6:41pm, p...@whooppee.com (Paul Goyette) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: compat work.
| Yeah, it was a bit trickier than just resolving the few conflicts that
| CVS found, but not as difficult as I'd feared.
Yes, there is only non compat code in uvm_swap.c (except the lines that
declare the
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, Christos Zoulas wrote:
That is my goal too. I have completed disentangling the compat swap code
so now you should be able to sync your branch with head (taking the head
changes) and it will all work. This is the way I envision compat things
to hook into the main code with
