In article <468095c0-b973-7f23-1cfa-3dc19e3b8...@gmail.com>,
Rin Okuyama wrote:
>On 2019/11/22 10:56, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>> In article <679493cf-3e85-f56d-85e4-dfaf7958a...@gmail.com>,
>> Rin Okuyama wrote:
>...
>>> This was my misunderstanding. These codes are used when tracer is 64-bit
>>
On 22.11.2019 02:42, Robert Elz wrote:
> Date:Fri, 22 Nov 2019 01:04:56 +0100
> From:Kamil Rytarowski
> Message-ID: <1a9d9b40-42fe-be08-d7b3-e6ecead5b...@gmx.com>
>
>
> | I think that picking C11 terminology is the way forward.
>
> Use a name like that iff the int
On 2019/11/22 15:58, Michał Górny wrote:
On Fri, 2019-11-22 at 10:10 +0900, Rin Okuyama wrote:
Hi, thank you for your review!
On 2019/11/22 0:48, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
On 21.11.2019 10:49, Rin Okuyama wrote:
...
I wrote a draft version of patch which adds PT32_[GS]ETXMMREGS support:
http:
Maxime Villard wrote:
> How about _onestep()? Or _nosplit()?
Or just conclude that there are no good options and we might as well
call it _once() to be compatible with other OSes.
--
Andreas Gustafsson, g...@gson.org
Le 21/11/2019 à 23:08, David Young a écrit :
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 07:19:51PM +0100, Maxime Villard wrote:
Le 18/11/2019 à 19:49, David Holland a écrit :
On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 02:35:43PM +, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
> David Holland wrote:
> > > I see the potential source of c
