In article <468095c0-b973-7f23-1cfa-3dc19e3b8...@gmail.com>, Rin Okuyama <rokuyama...@gmail.com> wrote: >On 2019/11/22 10:56, Christos Zoulas wrote: >> In article <679493cf-3e85-f56d-85e4-dfaf7958a...@gmail.com>, >> Rin Okuyama <rokuyama...@gmail.com> wrote: >... >>> This was my misunderstanding. These codes are used when tracer is 64-bit >>> and traced is 32-bit. Don't know whether this is useful though... >> >> Yes, and someone broke them because all the ptrace 64->32 calls for >> registers seem to return 0 now. Was that code changed recently? >... > >I fixed it: >http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2019/11/22/msg111068.html > >Now, gdb/amd64 seems to work for i386 binaries to some extent, at least.
Thanks! I think that the gdb on head should working for i386 binaries on amd64. I am installing a new kernel and userland and I will test shortly. christos
