> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 06:01:29PM -0300, Lourival Vieira Neto wrote:
> > > Also, having to switch mentally between zero-based arrays in the
> > > kernel C
> > > code and 1-based arrays in the Lua code make my head ache.
Above this well-discussed inconvenience there is a thing which may hurt
mor
2013/10/21 Marc Balmer :
> Am 20.10.13 22:02, schrieb Artem Falcon:
>
> [...]
>
>> Ok, here i have a clean diff. Sorry for the attach instead of inline.
>> By the way, do you want to move from malloc(9) to kmem(9) as
>> recommended? I may provide a draft version, i
18.10.2013, в 21:03, John Nemeth написал(а):
> On Oct 18, 11:03am, Marc Balmer wrote:
> } Am 18.10.13 10:43, schrieb Artem Falcon:
> } > Marc Balmer msys.ch> writes:
> } >>>> Justin Cormack specialbusservice.com> writes:
> } >>>> I have bee
Lourival Vieira Neto gmail.com> writes:
>
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Justin Cormack
> specialbusservice.com> wrote:
> >(...)
> > Yes absolutely it makes more sense if already defined in C. For parsing
> > binary stuff I would look at Erlang for inspiration too, it is one of the
> > nic
Marc Balmer msys.ch> writes:
> >> Justin Cormack specialbusservice.com> writes:
> >> I have been using the luajit ffi and luaffi, which let you directly
> >> use C structs (with bitfields) in Lua to do this. It makes it easier
> >> to reuse stuff that is already defined in C. (luaffi is not in it
Mouse Rodents-Montreal.ORG> writes:
> ...
> I think the biggest reasons I haven't tried to push any of those into
> NetBSD are (1) a perception that NetBSD doesn't want my changes,
> combined with (2) a lack of motivation to, a sort of "NetBSD no longer
> cares about me; why should I care about i
Marc Balmer msys.ch> writes:
>
> Hi All
>
> I am in the progress of
>
> ...
> - Commiting the kernel parts from our GSoC project, "Lua in the NetBSD
> Kernel"
> ...
>
> - mbalmer
>
>
Hi, Marc
Had you managed to fix broken things i mentioned here? [1]
Thank you!
[1] http://marc.info/?l=
Marc Balmer msys.ch> writes:
> Sure. The full diff is at
> http://www.netbsd.org/~mbalmer/diffs/kernel_lua_010.diff and it's the files
> that the diff now places in sys/modules/lua/ that I think should better go to
> sys/dev/lua/
Marc,
Very nice work!
However, i've found few problems in the co
Marc Balmer msys.ch> writes:
> Sure. The full diff is at
> http://www.netbsd.org/~mbalmer/diffs/kernel_lua_010.diff and it's the files
> that the diff now places in sys/modules/lua/ that I think should better go to
> sys/dev/lua/
Marc,
Very nice work!
However, i've found few problems in the co
