> On Dec 8, 2020, at 8:01 AM, i...@netbsd.org wrote:
>
>
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 08:54:33PM -0500, Mouse wrote:
>> I've been thinking about building a way to move a job between shells,
>> in particular between one window, ssh session, whatever, and another.
>
> Yes, I
> On Apr 6, 2021, at 1:54 PM, Greg A. Woods wrote:
>
> At Mon, 5 Apr 2021 23:18:55 -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> Subject: Re: regarding the changes to kernel entropy gathering
>>
>>> dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/random bs=32 count=1
>>
>> It's no better.
>
> So then I would say tha
> On Apr 6, 2021, at 2:21 PM, Martin Husemann wrote:
>
>
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 10:54:51AM -0700, Greg A. Woods wrote:
>> Except it seems to be useless in practice without an initial seed,
>
> Yes.
>
>> And the stock implementation has no possibility of ever pr
> On May 27, 2021, at 4:14 PM, Robert Elz wrote:
>
> ...
> While changing ms to us is probably a good idea, when a change happens,
> the "hz" part should be changed too.
>
> hz is (a unit of) a measure of frequency, ms (or us) is (a unit of) a
> measure of time (duration) - converting one to
> On Nov 23, 2021, at 12:53 PM, Valery Ushakov wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 09:22:43 -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
>>
>> I think (memory is getting fuzzy) the problem is that the old terminals
>> had a delete key, in the upper right, that users use to remove the
>> previous character,
> On Mar 9, 2022, at 5:18 AM, jo...@nonadev.net wrote:
>
> Hello tech-kern,
>
> I'm discorvering the article about language-neutral-interfaces for system
> calls.
>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://wiki.netbsd.org/projects/project/language-neutral-interfaces/__;!!LpKI!yl7D58zoWsSSbdJtiN2
> On Mar 20, 2022, at 7:58 PM, Mouse wrote:
>
>
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>
>>> Perhaps I just need a better approach
>
>> I know you've previously expressed a lack of interest in such things
>> when we've talked previously, but I've found the built-in sanitizers
>> in modern GCC useful for a
> On Mar 22, 2022, at 1:17 PM, Rhialto wrote:
>
> On Sun 20 Mar 2022 at 23:17:57 -0400, Mouse wrote:
>> clang is - or at least was last I checked - under the impression that
>> nested functions are little-used and thus are not worth supporting.
>
> I guess they can think so because nested fun
> On Mar 22, 2022, at 2:23 PM, Mouse wrote:
>
>
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>
>>> I found an interesting article about why they're bad...
>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://thephd.dev/lambdas-nested-functions-block-expressions-oh-my__;!!LpKI!1zB1gatUTEiM-j9CQ_6N-NWd4jS8UvW5iTSMRgW1tEyW_mK0mG2pU
> On Mar 22, 2022, at 4:53 PM, Rhialto wrote:
>
> On Tue 22 Mar 2022 at 17:46:49 +0000, Koning, Paul wrote:
>> I don't believe ALGOL implementations needed executable stacks to implement
>> nested functions, for example.
>
> No, a common way to do it (as
> On Mar 22, 2022, at 5:11 PM, Rhialto wrote:
>
> On Tue 22 Mar 2022 at 20:59:05 +0000, Koning, Paul wrote:
> ...
>> If it does, that would mean you can't get a pointer to a nested
>> function, which is no different from the C++ rule that you can't get
> On Mar 22, 2022, at 1:21 PM, Greg A. Woods wrote:
>
> At Mon, 21 Mar 2022 08:54:43 -0400 (EDT), Mouse
> wrote:
> Subject: pcc [was Re: valgrind]
>>
I've been making very-spare-time progress on building my own
compiler on and off for some years now; perhaps I'll eventually get
>>
> On Jul 19, 2022, at 9:57 AM, Mouse wrote:
>
>
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>
> I've been exchanging email off-list about this with a few people. One
> of them remarked that a kernel coredump would help.
>
> Yesterday it wedged again. I got a kernel coredump...and, well, as I
> put it in off-list
> On Jul 19, 2022, at 6:45 PM, Mouse wrote:
>
>
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>
>>> [...kernel coredump...kernel stack traces...]
>>> [...dig up a way to get userland stack traces...]
>
>> I did a pile of work on GDB, 10 or more years ago, to add that
>> capability for the non-standard system coredu
14 matches
Mail list logo