On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 12:25:09PM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
Is there some reason why kern/Makefile isn't used to create the table at
the same time as creating the other various syscall-related sources?
All kinds of things about syscalls should be auto-generated that
aren't.
I've just noticed that the table in sys/kern/kern_syscall.c is not
generated from the kern/syscalls.master file.
Is there some reason why kern/Makefile isn't used to create the table at
the same time as creating the other various syscall-related sources?
On Fri, 8 May 2015, Christos Zoulas wrote:
| Well, there's already a MODULAR keyword for kern/makesyscalls.sh so it
| doesn't seem to be so difficult to possibly add one more parameter to
| those lines (to identify the name of the containing module). Then the
| MODULAR syscalls could all be
On Sat, 9 May 2015, David Holland wrote:
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 06:00:05PM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
I've just noticed that the table in sys/kern/kern_syscall.c is not
generated from the kern/syscalls.master file.
Is there some reason why kern/Makefile isn't used to create the table at
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 06:00:05PM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
I've just noticed that the table in sys/kern/kern_syscall.c is not
generated from the kern/syscalls.master file.
Is there some reason why kern/Makefile isn't used to create the table at
the same time as creating the other
In article pine.neb.4.64.1505081756290.25...@vps1.whooppee.com,
Paul Goyette p...@whooppee.com wrote:
I've just noticed that the table in sys/kern/kern_syscall.c is not
generated from the kern/syscalls.master file.
Is there some reason why kern/Makefile isn't used to create the table at
the
On Fri, 8 May 2015, Christos Zoulas wrote:
In article pine.neb.4.64.1505081756290.25...@vps1.whooppee.com,
Paul Goyette p...@whooppee.com wrote:
I've just noticed that the table in sys/kern/kern_syscall.c is not
generated from the kern/syscalls.master file.
Is there some reason why
