On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 04:23:53PM +0100, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
David Holland dholland-t...@netbsd.org wrote:
Vaguely related to which, does anyone object to wrapping VOP_UNLOCK in
a vn_unlock() function (doing nothing extra), so as to be symmetric
with vn_lock()? I think I've
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 04:23:53PM +0100, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
David Holland dholland-t...@netbsd.org wrote:
Vaguely related to which, does anyone object to wrapping VOP_UNLOCK in
a vn_unlock() function (doing nothing extra), so as to be symmetric
with vn_lock()? I think I've
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 04:54:46PM +0200, Juergen Hannken-Illjes wrote:
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 10:39:27AM +0200, Juergen Hannken-Illjes wrote:
The vnode lock operations currently work on a rw lock located inside the
vnode. I propose to move this lock into the file system node.
This
David Holland dholland-t...@netbsd.org wrote:
Vaguely related to which, does anyone object to wrapping VOP_UNLOCK in
a vn_unlock() function (doing nothing extra), so as to be symmetric
with vn_lock()? I think I've mentioned this before, but I'm not sure,
and if so it was a while back...
I
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 10:39:27AM +0200, Juergen Hannken-Illjes wrote:
The vnode lock operations currently work on a rw lock located inside the
vnode. I propose to move this lock into the file system node.
This place is more logical as we lock a file system node and not a vnode.
This
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 09:06:57AM +, Andrew Doran wrote:
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 10:39:27AM +0200, Juergen Hannken-Illjes wrote:
The vnode lock operations currently work on a rw lock located inside the
vnode. I propose to move this lock into the file system node.
This place is more
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 02:06:31AM +, David Holland wrote:
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 10:39:27AM +0200, Juergen Hannken-Illjes wrote:
The vnode lock operations currently work on a rw lock located inside the
vnode. I propose to move this lock into the file system node.
This place is
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 06:18:19PM +0200, Juergen Hannken-Illjes wrote:
(In the absence of some clear benefits I don't think it's a
particularly good idea to paste a dozen or two copies of genfs_lock
everywhere. But folding vcrackmgr() into genfs_lock and genfs_unlock
seems like a fine
The vnode lock operations currently work on a rw lock located inside the
vnode. I propose to move this lock into the file system node.
This place is more logical as we lock a file system node and not a vnode.
This becomes clear if we think of a file system where one file system node
is attached
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 10:39:27AM +0200, Juergen Hannken-Illjes wrote:
The vnode lock operations currently work on a rw lock located inside the
vnode. I propose to move this lock into the file system node.
This place is more logical as we lock a file system node and not a vnode.
This
10 matches
Mail list logo
