On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 04:23:53PM +0100, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote: > David Holland <dholland-t...@netbsd.org> wrote: > > Vaguely related to which, does anyone object to wrapping VOP_UNLOCK in > > a vn_unlock() function (doing nothing extra), so as to be symmetric > > with vn_lock()? I think I've mentioned this before, but I'm not sure, > > and if so it was a while back... > > I think it would be useful to have symmetric vn_unlock(), yes. Can be a > static inline in vnode.h header.
If you're striving for clean KPI, don't do static inline in header files. :-) Take care, Bill
pgphJS1nDPtDt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
