David Holland dholland-t...@netbsd.org wrote:
The following (untested) patch reverts the defective O_SEARCH
implementation that was committed along with the *at calls back in
November.
No problem for me, thank you for cleaning it up.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 09:36:24AM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
build and run. I've also arranged lib/libc/c063/t_o_search.c so that
the tests that make use of the O_SEARCH semantics will disappear until
O_SEARCH comes back, and fixed some mistakes and/or incorrect hacks
that were
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 08:49:06AM +, David Holland wrote:
Nope, don't have that kind of setup and atf is way too invasive to
allow just building the test programs somewhere else.
ATF is available from pkgsrc and straight forward to install, so I tried
on FreeBSD 9, but they do not have
On Jan 13, 2013, at 12:59 AM, Martin Husemann wrote:
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 08:49:06AM +, David Holland wrote:
Nope, don't have that kind of setup and atf is way too invasive to
allow just building the test programs somewhere else.
ATF is available from pkgsrc and straight forward to
In article 74e9a033-b75c-45b8-beee-a7380baa8...@gmail.com,
Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 13, 2013, at 12:59 AM, Martin Husemann wrote:
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 08:49:06AM +, David Holland wrote:
Nope, don't have that kind of setup and atf is way too invasive to
allow just
In article c96ccc7b-08cc-4404-b567-1a5aa2c02...@gmail.com,
Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
This is what I would like to happen (similar to LTP with Linux), but it
hasn't yet because of other items on my priority list of things to do.
But, I would really like working with someone
The following (untested) patch reverts the defective O_SEARCH
implementation that was committed along with the *at calls back in
November.
I am currently building and testing it and will commit it when that
finishes.
I have left O_SEARCH defined and visible and made open() explicitly
ignore it.
