2010/10/26 Qiang Li:
> It sounds good. However, would the anaconda contained in boot.iso of the
> most recent install media be too old to support rawhide installation?
> Or, would it be better to grab boot.iso from fedora branched repo, e.g.
> http:///fedora/development/14/x86_64/os/images ? Have
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 12:40 +0800, Qiang Li wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 22:14 +0200, Christoph Frieben wrote:
> > 2010/10/25 Qiang Li:
> > > What kind of way do you use to install a fresh fedora rawhide?
> >
> > You grab the most recent install media, e.g. F14 RC1, and add the
> > rawhide repo
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 22:14 +0200, Christoph Frieben wrote:
> 2010/10/25 Qiang Li:
> > What kind of way do you use to install a fresh fedora rawhide?
>
> You grab the most recent install media, e.g. F14 RC1, and add the
> rawhide repo during the repo customization stage of anaconda. This
> approac
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 13:46 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> yeah, that's how I'd do it. But actually, I don't run Rawhide
> anywhere.
> I tend to switch to the upcoming release soon after the branch event.
Do you mean switching by reinstalling?
Qiang
--
Qiang Li
HuBei Polytechnic Institute
No.
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 15:43 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> Your preferences are no longer available.
>
> 1) If you'd like to try installing rawhide directly, you're welcome to
> roll your own images (to get started, check out
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_build_a_Rawhide_ISO_image_for_test
> On 10/25/2010 12:57 PM, Qiang Li wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 11:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 02:14 +0800, Qiang Li wrote:
> >> 1) Direct Rawhide install via standalone Anaconda
> >> 2) Direct Rawhide install via Live installer
> >> 3) Yum update from a test re
On 25/10/10 16:30, Steven Haigh wrote:
> I'd love to see this fixed before release:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630671
>
> The majority works, the only thing that lets it down is the GUI to
> configure 2 finger scrolling on touchpad hardware that supports
> reporting finger width.
On 10/25/2010 08:47 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 20:39 -0400, mwesten wrote:
>
Had another thought about this. There's a forum poster reporting similar
issue:
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=253221
(is that you, Steven?) and it
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 20:39 -0400, mwesten wrote:
> > >
> > > Had another thought about this. There's a forum poster reporting similar
> > > issue:
> > >
> > > http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=253221
> > >
> > > (is that you, Steven?) and it made me think of this bug jlaska reported:
/ >
/>/ > Had another thought about this. There's a forum poster reporting similar
/>/ > issue:
/>/ >
/>/ > http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=253221
/>/ >
/>/ > (is that you, Steven?) and it made me think of this bug jlaska reported:
/>/
/>/ Nah - not me... Interestingly
Could I get a few ACKs to the two procedures below...
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora14#Fedora_12_EOL_Warning
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora14#Fedora_12_EOL_Closure
Need confirmation that the outlined steps and text look correct. Plea
#146: Proventester membership request
-+--
Reporter: bit4man | Owner:
Type: proventester request | Status: new
Priority: minor| Milestone:
C
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 08:29 +1100, Steven Haigh wrote:
> On 26/10/10 08:14, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 08:54 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >> On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 22:24 +0200, Fabian A. Scherschel wrote:
> >>> I have the same thing. Except I can't even hibernate or suspend
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/25/10 11:57 AM, Qiang Li wrote:
> What kind of way do you use to install a fresh fedora rawhide?
Take the boot.iso from the previous release or test release. Pass it a
'repo=' to a rawhide mirror. You'll use the install /images/ from
the previ
On 26/10/10 08:14, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 08:54 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 22:24 +0200, Fabian A. Scherschel wrote:
>>> I have the same thing. Except I can't even hibernate or suspend
>>> properly in the first place.
>>
>> Then, um, how do you
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 08:54 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 22:24 +0200, Fabian A. Scherschel wrote:
> > I have the same thing. Except I can't even hibernate or suspend
> > properly in the first place.
>
> Then, um, how do you know you have this problem?
>
> In my case,
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 15:48 -0500, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
> Will there be an F14 Release Candidate 2 between now and Tuesday?
An additional release candidate isn't planned. There are currently no
F14Blocker bugs that have yet demanded a respin (and thus a slip) of the
Fedora 14 release.
h
Will there be an F14 Release Candidate 2 between now and Tuesday?
--Doc Savage
Fairview Heights, IL
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 15:43 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > I don't like updating from a test release or previous release, because
> > it takes too much time, bandwidth and it's hard to solve broken
> > dependency.
>
> I'm not sure the previous options work around these issues. Rawhide is
> not g
2010/10/25 Qiang Li:
> What kind of way do you use to install a fresh fedora rawhide?
You grab the most recent install media, e.g. F14 RC1, and add the
rawhide repo during the repo customization stage of anaconda. This
approach will work most of the time.
~C
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedor
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 02:57 +0800, Qiang Li wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 11:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 02:14 +0800, Qiang Li wrote:
> >
> > > My question is what option I have if the first two ways are not
> > > applicable? Ask for boot.iso that contains daily ana
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 02:14 +0800, Qiang Li wrote:
> If I choose No. 1, this article says "Daily Anaconda builds are no
> longer automatically available in Rawhide, only in Branched code.
> Pre-Alpha Anaconda code is generally not testable, and it is important
> to test the installer that will appe
On 10/25/2010 12:57 PM, Qiang Li wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 11:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 02:14 +0800, Qiang Li wrote:
>> 1) Direct Rawhide install via standalone Anaconda
>> 2) Direct Rawhide install via Live installer
>> 3) Yum update from a test release
>> 4) Y
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 11:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 02:14 +0800, Qiang Li wrote:
>
> > My question is what option I have if the first two ways are not
> > applicable? Ask for boot.iso that contains daily anaconda build from
> > James Laska, or using live installer aft
Join us on irc.freenode.net #fedora-meeting for this important meeting.
Tuesday October 26, 2010 @ 21:00 UTC (17:00 EDT/14:00 PDT)
"Before each public release Development, QA, and Release Engineering
meet to determine if the release criteria are met for a particular
release. This meeting is cal
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 02:14 +0800, Qiang Li wrote:
> My question is what option I have if the first two ways are not
> applicable? Ask for boot.iso that contains daily anaconda build from
> James Laska, or using live installer after fedora 14 is released and
> before fedora 15 has branched?
Inst
Hi,
I would like to do a fresh rawhide installation and referred to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Rawhide. Four ways are mentioned
in this article,
1) Direct Rawhide install via standalone Anaconda
2) Direct Rawhide install via Live installer
3) Yum update from a test release
4) Yum upda
On 10/25/2010 01:54 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> People,
>
> This release is improved over the beta but I have issues to resolve before
> I can do more testing:
>
> Trying to install kmod-wl fails with:
>
> Error: Package: kmod-wl-2.6.35.4-28.fc14.i686-5.60.48.36-2.fc14.i686
> (rpmfusion-nonfree-u
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 16:54 +1100, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> People,
>
> This release is improved over the beta but I have issues to resolve before
> I can do more testing:
>
> Trying to install kmod-wl fails with:
>
> Error: Package: kmod-wl-2.6.35.4-28.fc14.i686-5.60.48.36-2.fc14.i686
> (rpmfusi
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 10:52 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> James Laska wrote:
> > # Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
> > # Date: 2010-10-25
> > # Time: 15:00 UTC (11:00 EDT, 17:00 CEST) [1]
> > # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
>
> And... the meeting minutes.
>
> Minutes:
> ht
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 01:15 +0800, Qiang Li wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 10:44 -0600, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> > When I boot, the transition from plymouth to KDM occurs immediately. There
> > is
> > no waiting.
> >
> > It is when I power off, that I see the
> >
> > could not write bytes:
On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 22:24 +0200, Fabian A. Scherschel wrote:
> I have the same thing. Except I can't even hibernate or suspend
> properly in the first place.
Then, um, how do you know you have this problem?
In my case, I don't hibernate, but I can't reproduce it with suspend.
--
Adam Willi
On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 12:53 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> On 10/23/2010 11:46 AM, Jeff Raber wrote:
> > rpm -qif /usr/bin/sealert
>
>
> Basic knowledge I have now gained. Thx!!
alternative: rpm -qf `which selaert`
handy if you don't know if the executable is in /bin or /sbin
or /usr/bin or /
James Laska wrote:
> # Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
> # Date: 2010-10-25
> # Time: 15:00 UTC (11:00 EDT, 17:00 CEST) [1]
> # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
And... the meeting minutes.
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-10-25/fedora_qa.2010-10-25-15.0
Compose started at Mon Oct 25 13:15:08 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
qtgpsc-0.2.3-6.fc12.x86_64 requires libgps.so.18()(64bit)
rakudo-0.0.2010.08_2.7.0-1.fc14.x86_64 requires
libparrot.so.2.7.0()(64bit)
Broken deps fo
Compose started at Mon Oct 25 08:15:05 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
PyKDE4-4.5.2-5.fc15.x86_64 requires PyQt4 >= 0:4.8n
ScientificPython-2.8-11.fc14.x86_64 requires libmpi.so.0()(64bit)
ScientificPython-2.8-11.fc
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 11:49 +0800, He Rui wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 04:43 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > In this test case
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_remote_system
> >
> > there's this sentence:
> > # On the Save dialog, choose Remote server from
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2010-10-25
# Time: 15:00 UTC (11:00 EDT, 17:00 CEST) [1]
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings gang,
Unfortunately, I have a conflict today during our regular QA meeting
time slot. Is someone available to lead the meeting and manage
38 matches
Mail list logo
